Laserfiche WebLink
that he'll soon need a satellite facility. He said gross sales was <br />$4 million, and that this was a wholesale business. He emphasized <br />that the problem appeared to be communication, lack thereof. He <br />was told of things he must do and to pay his money. He held the <br />City needed a pro-business policy. <br />He related that in 1976 he was responsible for corporate <br />development in San Francisco, specifically the Spice Island Spices. <br />The organization had overgrown its facilities and needed to <br />relocate. There was a lack of cooperation and burdensome <br />regulations from the local municipality so he made the decision to <br />move the business to Sparks, Nevada, where they were anxious have <br />this business. Mayor Fulp directed the City Manager to exchange <br />telephone numbers with Mr. Watson. <br />Recycle fee <br />Ms. Rachel Warner, 935 Flores, inquired about Ordinance No. 0-11- <br />90, specifically Refuse Rate of $1.00 for recycle fee. She wondered <br />what happened to this ordinance. Ms. Warner asked where all the <br />money went to since all the trucks are old. Where is the revenue <br />going into? <br />Director Chamberlain informed that the City does bill $1 which is <br />posted to refuse and the monies pay for the cost of operations. <br />She offered to review this matter and return with further <br />information. Councilmember Beltran requested a study to find out <br />what the $1.00 is generating; find out why there is not an ongoing <br />change; and to provide personnel cost, equipment cost and bin cost, <br />in other words all the heavy cost factors. With approval of <br />Council, Mayor Fulp directed the City Manager to assemble an update <br />to Ordinance No. 0-11-90, to report on the revenue being generated <br />on a regular basis and as to how the money has been spent in the <br />past four years. <br />Business License Fees <br />Mr. Dale Keys, 901 No. Acacia, Rialto, said, for 15 years, he had <br />operated a business in Colton. He reported that since 1991 to <br />present business had declined 40% and he has seen fees go up 130%. <br />He exclaimed that he could not afford to pay for this increase and <br />said he was considering relocating his business elsewhere. He said <br />he had not received a refund, approved by Council, as he expected <br />in 1993. Director Zamora advised there had been no increases to <br />the business license fee since the last update in 1975. The <br />business license fee is based on gross receipts. Councilmember <br />Cook, as a businesswoman, agreed with Mr. Keys in that there was an <br />increase of about 150%. She explained that refunds were made as <br />credits against the following year's allocation of fees. With <br />Council approval, Mayor Fulp directed the City Manager to study and <br />report on this matter. <br />7 <br />DEC 201994 <br />