My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
1995 JT MIN NOV 16
Colton
>
CITY CLERK
>
City Council Minutes
>
1991-2000
>
1995
>
1995 JT MIN NOV 16
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/24/2014 5:37:02 PM
Creation date
2/20/2014 10:15:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General Documents
Created By
admin
DocType
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
F� <br />He showed photos of how they reused a facility in Florida. He explained how raw waste goes to treatment, to <br />aeration tank (for every gallon that goes in, one comes out of pipe), solids circulate around tank, is aerated, enters <br />into the back, and settles to the bottom. <br />They propose to have a concrete structure. And they will have some of the equipment manufactured here. They <br />plan to progress on a turn -key basis so other contractors can provide bids separately. <br />United has perfected systems to reduce energy, amount of manpower, and reduce requirements to do work. <br />LEMNA, USA, Inc. - Steven M. Vogel, President/CEO <br />There are two separate corporations. They have eighty offices <br />He thanked Mr. Evans and the Utilities Commission for their efforts. He also thanked the City Council and <br />Commission for their visit of site in Nevada. <br />LEMNA is a duckweed system. They received the 1995 Engineering Excellence award. The Tennessee plant is <br />similar to the one projected for Colton. Mark Adelson, of the Regional Water Quality Control Board, affirmed <br />the statement that it would meet Colton's ammonia limits. <br />Mr. Vogel referred to the booklet materials that were handed out. Their Arkansas plant is at 3mgd (close to <br />what the City needs) and he gave an overview of plant in Louisiana which is operated with 4hp. <br />Mr. Vogel's closing points were that it has the lowest capital cost, is more efficient, has lowest operational cost - <br />the same number of people will easily take care it, has lowest energy cost, and lowest guaranteed project cost. <br />Dave McAnaney, P.E., Director of Technical Sales Support stated he has all the technical data and he will <br />provide it. There was some discussion about the ponds and capacity increase. <br />Benefits of the LEMNA system are that it has better cost for additional flow, improved operating efficiency, and <br />it is a simple operation. He reviewed the benefits of the system as summarized in their packet. Their bottom line <br />figure is $2.826M. <br />It was affirmed that they have had some learning experiences due to the innovativeness of the process. They have <br />had to learn to deal with hot air and other various climates. The systems are now working very well. For this <br />area, it was also noted that there is native duckweed so it is not hard to come by. There are five different <br />duckweed species. Some will rise or thin out according to temperature and disease. In winter it takes little to no <br />harvesting, and more in the two to three hottest months of the year. Recommended disposal is to haul it to a <br />nearby composting plant. <br />Montgomery -Watson - Roger V. Stephenson, Ph.D., P.E., Principal Engineer <br />Mr. Stephenson explained their objectives with the process, its application, capability, and advantages. Some of <br />the detailed matters discussed included: traditional oxidation ditch processes; characteristics of 24-hour hydraulic <br />detention time; and use of brush or surf turbine aerators. <br />3 <br />NOV 16 1995 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.