2000 ORD O-02-00 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

110 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Financing arrangements would result from such deferral, or where imposition of such fees would cause inequities. K To assure fair implementation of the development fees, provisions must be made for extending such fees to subsequently annexed land that benefits from the public facilities by these fees. L. Notice of the public meeting adopting this resolution has been given in with Government Code Sections 66016 through 66018. M. The Proposed Project will not have a significant effect on the environment and warrants the filing of a Negative Declaration. SECTION 3: Study. The City Council hereby accepts the Capital Infrastructure Study, however, with regard to park fees, the City Council hereby directs staff to commission a comprehensive citywide master plan and needs assessment studies for parks with the goal of establishing future park fees. Funding for the master plan and needs assessment studies shall be available through previously collected park development fees. With regard to traffic fees, the City Council hereby accepts the 1993 Mohle-Grover Study, including the revisions to the Mohle- Grover Study made by City staff. SECTION 4: Park Fees - Findings. A. The development of property in the City will create a need for additional parkland and park improvements to meet the City's General Plan and Quimby Act goals and needs at build -out and maintain current levels of service. B. Although the Study identifies a current parkland deficiency of 74 acres in order to current Quimby Act goals, the fees recommended in the Study do not take into account such deficiency. Instead, the recommended fees are based only on the City s parkland needs to meet incremental build -out population of 26,124 persons. The acquisition of additional parkland and