Laserfiche WebLink
I ORDINANCE NO. 0-14-03 <br />2 <br />AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF <br />3 COLTON PRE -ZONING 25 PARCELS OF LAND TOTALING 57.2 <br />4 ACRES IN THE CITY OF COLTON SPHERE OF INFLUENCE <br />5 LOCATED ON THE EAST AND WEST SIDE OF RECHE CANYON <br />ROAD, IMMEDIATELY NORTH OF THE SAN <br />6 BERNARDINO/RIVERSIDE COUNTY LINE WITHIN SOUTH <br />7 ANNEXATION AREA NO. S-51 (SUBAREAS 1 - 2): FILE INDEX <br />8 NO. DAP -000-031 <br />9 WHEREAS, the City of Colton initiated an application on April 11, 2002 (File No. DAP <br />10 000-031) to prezone 25 unincorporated County island parcels totaling 57.2 acres within the City's <br />11 Sphere of Influence located on the east and west side of Reche Canyon Road, immediately north of <br />the San Bernardino/Riverside County line ("Application"); and <br />12 <br />13 WHEREAS, the Application was referred to all affected public agencies for review <br />14 and consideration; and <br />15 WHEREAS, the Application was reviewed, studied, and found to be consistent with <br />16 the City's adopted General Plan; and <br />17 <br />WHEREAS, on May 6, 2002, the Design Review Committee reviewed the Application <br />18 and the draft Negative Declaration and recommended that the Application proceed to the Planning <br />19 Commission for consideration; and <br />20 <br />WHEREAS, on May 28, 2002, the Planning Commission of the City of Colton <br />21 ("Planning Commission") conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the Application at which time <br />22 all persons wishing to testify in connection with the proposed Application were heard, and the <br />23 Application was comprehensively reviewed; and <br />24 <br />WHEREAS, the Planning Commission also considered the information contained in <br />25 the draft negative declaration prepared for the Application in compliance with the California <br />26 Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the CEQA Guidelines, including the initial study and <br />comments received during the public review period, and found that the proposed Application will not <br />27 significantly impact the environment or wildlife, and therefore recommended that the City Council <br />28 adopt a Negative Declaration for the Application; and <br />193 <br />