Laserfiche WebLink
Staff Report to the Mayor and City Council <br />Public Hearing - Redistricting <br />January 4, 2022 <br />Page 2 <br /> <br /> <br />called redistricting, ensures all districts have substantially equal population. The redistricting <br />process for the City of Colton must be completed by April 17, 2022. The first of four scheduled <br />public hearings was held on November 16, 2021, and provided an overview of the redistricting <br />process. This is the second public hearing in the redistricting process. <br /> <br />In November 2018, the voters in the City adopted Measure R, which reduced the number of <br />districts from 6 to 4, beginning with the 2022 election. A map identifying the district boundaries <br />was included with the text of the Measure, however the Measure did provide that the districts <br />may be adjusted from time to time as required by law and with each subsequent decennial <br />census. At this time, the districts must now be reviewed using the 2020 census data and in <br />compliance with the FAIR MAPS Act, which was adopted by the California legislature as AB <br />849 and took effect January 1, 2020. The map approved by the electorate as part of Measure R <br />was used as a starting point to review and redraw the City’s four districts using the 2020 census <br />data to achieve population balance, the key requirement under both the FAIR MAPS Act and the <br />Federal Voting Rights Act. <br /> <br />As noted at the first public hearing, currently, the four district map approved with Measure R <br />exhibits an 11.95% deviation between the least populated and greatest populated districts when <br />2020 Census data is incorporated into it. The data indicates that the chief cause of this deviation <br />is District 4, where there is an 8.01% excess in total population over equal. District 2 is the <br />district that goes most in the other direction – a 3.94% deficit in total population under equal. <br />“Substantially equal in population” is defined by the U.S. Supreme Court as being within a 10% <br />or less deviation. As such, the four district map approved with Measure R must be redrawn to <br />achieve population balance; in particular to reduce the total population of District 4. <br /> <br />Incorporating the 2020 Census data, the City’s redistricting consultant has prepared two initial <br />map options for the Council’s and public’s consideration. The purpose of this second public <br />hearing is to share proposed map options and receive feedback on the maps presented. Each of <br />those maps is analyzed below. <br /> <br />Map Option 1 <br /> <br />Map Option 1 begins with a simple population rebalance, to reduce the total deviation to an <br />acceptable level. Closely resembling the cu rrent Council district boundary map, as approved by <br />voters with Measure R, this map primarily reduces population in District 4 and distributes it <br />relatively evenly throughout the remaining three districts. The map reflects an acceptable total <br />deviation of 1.22%. Based upon the citizens of voting age population (CVAP) metric, all four <br />districts are majority/minority Hispanic voting districts, meaning that Hispanic voters makeup <br />the single largest citizen voting age population. Complete demographic analysi s of the census <br />data for Map Option 1 is attached to this report. <br /> <br />The map is depicted here: <br />1.1 <br />Packet Pg. 9