My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
R-011-22 Expressing Support for the “Brand-Huang-Mendoza Tripartisan Land Use Initiative” to Amend Article XI of the Constitution of the State of california to make Zoning and Land Use Community Affairs, and not of State Interest
Colton
>
CITY CLERK
>
City Council Resolutions
>
2020-2026
>
2022
>
R-011-22 Expressing Support for the “Brand-Huang-Mendoza Tripartisan Land Use Initiative” to Amend Article XI of the Constitution of the State of california to make Zoning and Land Use Community Affairs, and not of State Interest
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/7/2023 4:27:38 AM
Creation date
3/3/2022 8:42:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Agenda Type
City Council
CC - Doc Type
Resolution
Date
2/15/2022
Resolution No.
R-11-22
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SECTION 2. Section 4.5 is added to Article XI of the California Constitution, to read: <br />SEC. 4.5. (a) Except as provided in subdivision (b), in the event of a conflict with a state statute, <br />a county charter provision, general plan, specific plan, ordinance or a regulation adopted <br />pursuant to a county charter, that regulates the zoning, development or use of land within the <br />boundaries of an unincorporated area of the county shall be deemed a county affair within the <br />meaning of Section 4 and shall prevail over a conflicting state statute. No voter approved local <br />initiative that regulates the zoning, development or use of land within the boundaries of any <br />county shall be overturned or otherwise nullified by any legislative body. <br />(b) A county charter provision, general plan, specific plan, ordinance or a regulation adopted <br />and applicable to an unincorporated area within a county, may be determined only by a court of <br />competent jurisdiction, in accordance with Section 4, to address either a matter of statewide <br />concern or a county affair if that provision, ordinance, or regulation conflicts with a state <br />statute with regard to only the following: <br />(1) The California Coastal Act of 1976 (Division 20 (commencing with Section <br />30000) of the Public Resources Code), or a successor statute. <br />(2) The siting of a power generating facility capable of generating more than 50 <br />megawatts of electricity and the California Public Utilities Commission has determined <br />that a need exists at that location that is a matter of statewide concern. <br />(3) The development or construction of a water, communication or transportation <br />infrastructure project for which the Legislature has declared in statute the reasons why <br />the project addresses a matter of statewide concern and is in the best interests of the <br />state. For purposes of this paragraph, a transportation infrastructure project does not <br />include a transit -oriented development project, whether residential, commercial, or <br />mixed -use. <br />(c) No modification to appropriations for state funded programs shall occur, and no state <br />grant applications or funding shall be denied as a result of the application of this section. No <br />benefit or preference in state appropriations or grants shall be given to an entity that opts not <br />to utilize the provisions of this section. <br />(d) The provisions of this section are severable. If any provision of this section or its <br />application is held invalid, that invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications that <br />can be given effect without the invalid provision or application. <br />SECTION 3. Section 5.5 is added to Article XI of the California Constitution, to read: <br />SEC. 5.5. (a) Except as provided in subdivision (b), in the event of a conflict with a state <br />statute, a city charter provision, general plan, specific plan, ordinance or a regulation adopted <br />pursuant to a city charter, that establishes land use policies or regulates zoning or development <br />standards within the boundaries of the city shall be deemed a municipal affair within the <br />meaning of Section 5 and shall prevail over a conflicting state statute. No voter approved local <br />initiative that regulates the zoning, development or use of land within the boundaries of any <br />city shall be overturned or otherwise nullified by any legislative body. <br />(b) A city charter provision, general plan, specific plan, ordinance or a regulation adopted <br />pursuant to a city charter, may be determined only by a court of competent jurisdiction, in <br />accordance with Section 5, to address either a matter of statewide concern or a municipal affair <br />58277666A <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.