My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
2022-06-07- City Council- Full Agenda- Corrected
Colton
>
CITY CLERK
>
City Council Agendas
>
Agenda Packets
>
2020 - 2026
>
2022
>
2022-06-07- City Council- Full Agenda- Corrected
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/2/2022 10:06:28 AM
Creation date
6/2/2022 9:52:33 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
822
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Staff Report to the Mayor and City Council <br />Subdivision Ordinance Update and SB 9 <br />June 7, 2022 <br />Page 2 <br /> <br /> <br />and recreation facilities dedication and fees. This update is needed in order to achieve <br />consistency with legislation adopted over the past 45 years, including recently adopted <br />legislation, including Senate Bill 9, addressing “Urban Lot Splits” within single-family zones <br />that took effect on January 1, 2022. <br /> <br />On December 14, 2021, the Planning Commission approved by a 6-0-1 vote Resolution No. R- <br />34-21, recommending City Council approval of Subdivision Ordinance Update by conducting <br />the first reading. At the City Council’s public hearing on held on March 1, 2022, public <br />comment was provided by Scott McKhann, owner of Modern Pacific Homes. Mr. McKhann did <br />not provide comments during the Planning Commission hearing on the update. <br /> <br />Following public comment, the City Council continued the public hearing to April 19, 2022 <br />(subsequently continued again to May 3, 2022), and directed staff to address Mr. McKhann’s <br />comments, and make appropriate edits to the Ordinance, as necessary. Public Work/Engineering <br />staff, Planning staff and the City Attorney carefully reviewed each of Mr. McKhann’s comments <br />and have determined that most comments consist of policy disagreements with the proposed <br />Ordinance, not substantive errors. However, some incorrect cross-references and outdated <br />terminology was identified in the comments and minor corrections were made to the Ordinance <br />upon its return to the City Council on May 3, 2022. <br /> <br />At the May 3rd hearing, there were questions and comments from Council Members regarding <br />the Urban Lot Splits provisions in the Ordinance, specifically provisions pertaining to lot splits <br />within designated High and Very High Fire Hazard areas such as with the La Loma Mountain <br />area and Reche Canyon Specific Plan area. The public hearing was continued to this date in <br />order for staff to consult with the City Attorney on this issue to provide a fully informed <br />response. <br /> <br />ISSUES/ANALYSIS <br /> <br />Staff has consulted with the City Attorney on this matter and concluded that that prohibiting <br />urban lot splits within High Fire Zones is not in compliance with State law. Urban lot splits must <br />be permitted if compliance with fire code requirements and quantifiable or objective design <br />standards are met. The City of Colton’s Code proposed code requirements are written to provide <br />the most restrictive interpretation allowed by law in developing an urban lot split within ‘High <br />Fire Zone” areas as outlined in proposed Section 16.22.050 (11) Fire–Hazard Mitigation <br />Measures, which first requires an inspection of the site prior to submitting an application for an <br />urban lot split. This section also includes specific access requirements, compliance with current <br />fire code requirements for dwellings in a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone (which includes <br />both La Loma and Reche Canyon Areas), fire sprinkler requirements for all enclosed structures <br />(this may be interpreted to mean existing and proposed), require that all dwellings on the site <br />must be within 150 feet-hose-pull distance from either the public right-of-way or an on-site fire <br />hydrant or standpipe; and access to 5,000 gallon reservoir per dwelling with fire aut hority <br />1.1 <br />Packet Pg. 11
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.