My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Development Impact Fees Agreement with John Reichel (dba Sunwest Enterprises)
Colton
>
CITY CLERK
>
City Council Agendas
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000 - 2009
>
2001
>
03/06/2001 6:15 pm
>
STAFF REPORTS:
>
REDEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR:
>
Development Impact Fees Agreement
>
Development Impact Fees Agreement with John Reichel (dba Sunwest Enterprises)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/23/2014 8:45:34 PM
Creation date
2/19/2014 8:54:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Agenda Item
Meeting Date
3/6/2001
Meeting Time
6:15:00 PM
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
REQUEST FOR FEE CREDITSIWAIVERS <br />SUNWEST ENTERPRISES <br />(Traffic Impact Fees) <br />Evaluation of Chronology and Findings <br />To the best of staff's knowledge, there is no agreement in place that fixed a traffic impact <br />fee for all development that occurred within the CFD 89-2. The tentative tracts that were <br />approved prior to the adoption of a formal traffic impact fee program were conditioned <br />with a traffic fee of $266 per unit. The City of Colton maintained this fee without <br />adjustment for inflation or revised fee schedules for the duration of those tracts. The <br />Developer suggests that this fixing occurred due to the up -front completion of all street <br />improvements in 1990. This process is not typical for cities, as they usually do not fix <br />the development fees (absent a specific development agreement) until the act that <br />triggers the payment of fees occurs (i.e. tract map recordation, building permit issuance, <br />certificate of occupancy). This approach was apparently taken because it was a <br />negotiated fee rather than one based upon an adopted citywide program in accordance <br />with Government Code 66000. <br />Consequently, staff cannot establish for certain that the Developer (or any other <br />developer in CFD 89-2) has an entitlement to the $266 per residential unit fee absent an <br />approved tract map with that condition. There is no record of an absolute causal linkage <br />between the CFD 89-2 financed improvements and the $266 per unit fee, although there <br />is circumstantial evidence. <br />Staff and legal counsel believe that any undeveloped acreage that has not previously <br />been conditioned with a specific traffic impact fee is subject to the City's current <br />development impact fee schedule. Under the City's ordinances, the Developer may <br />receive consideration for traffic fees previously paid or for certain traffic improvements <br />previously constructed. <br />Approaches for Considering Developer's Claim <br />Staff considered two approaches for evaluating this claim: (1) applying the formula <br />previously applied to the tracts approved in CFD 89-2 as suggested by the Developer, or <br />(2) determining satisfaction of the standard outlined in Ordinance 0-00-02. <br />Formula Approach <br />The Developer has suggested that the City apply the factor that was established at the <br />time the majority of tract maps were approved by the City of Colton, all within 1-2 years <br />of the formation of the CFD and prior'to the effect of the Mohle-Grover fees. The fee <br />was $266.50 per residential unit. For commercial land uses, a fee of $1,066 per acre <br />would be applied based upon a 4 unit/acre conversion rate. This fee schedule would <br />produce total traffic impact fees of approximately $20,573 for the Developer's remaining <br />acreage in the CFD 89-2. This is $248,854 less than the fees that would be due under <br />the City's current fee schedules. <br />While recognizing that the average residential density of the CFD projects is close to 4 <br />units per acre, the relevant yardstick should be the variations in traffic impacts between <br />commercial and residential development. The City of Colton approved a Capital <br />Improvement Financing Program in July, 2000 that established the concept of equivalent <br />residential units for the purpose of determining fees for a wide range of projects. For <br />consistency, this would seem to be the appropriate conversion factor. The conversion <br />Page 4 of 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.