Laserfiche WebLink
REQUEST FOR FEE CREDITS/WAIVERS <br />SUNWEST ENTERPRISES <br />(Traffic Impact Fees) <br />formula as illustrated in Exhibit E is 7.74 units per commercial acre based upon a lot <br />coverage assumption of 22.5%. Staff recommends use of a factor of 7.75 residential <br />units per commercial acre. Based upon this factor, a. traffic signalization fee would apply <br />to all commercial uses based upon $2,065.38 per acre. <br />This approach has the advantage of simplicity in administration and is consistent with <br />prior practice on properties within the CFD 89-2. It acknowledges that the CFD funded <br />improvements that were in excess of normal tract requirements. The Developer is still <br />required to pay a traffic impact fee but at a rate much lower than the current fee <br />schedules provide. <br />Ordinance 0-00-02 Approach <br />Ordinance 0-02-00 provides that if the City can determine that the improvements <br />completed by the Developer would have otherwise been the burden of the traffic impact <br />fee program, then it would be appropriate to grant a credit for the value of these <br />improvements toward the traffic impact fees currently due. The Developer constructed <br />improvements that staff believes qualify under this definition. In fact, the Official <br />Statement for CFD 89-2 specifically states that the Developer(s) are constructing <br />regional sewer, water, street and landscaping improvements. The Developer(s) <br />constructed improvements in excess of what would normally have been conditioned had <br />the projects not been included in a CFD. The appropriate evaluation in accordance with <br />Ordinance 0-00-02 would be to identify each street project constructed by the CFD, <br />establish the total construction cost, determine what percentage if any qualified as a <br />regional improvement under our current fee ordinance, and then apportion the eligible <br />costs to the appropriate Developer(s). <br />Staff has attempted to complete this evaluation as illustrated in Exhibit F attached <br />hereto. The difficulty with this approach is determining ten years after project approval, <br />what improvements would have been a condition of approval of a tract map or a <br />mitigation measure under CEQA and which ones would have been a City responsibility. <br />In addition, the favorable financing terms provided by the CFD may have been a <br />consideration for the expanded scope of improvements. In any event, staff has <br />attempted to construct the analysis by assuming that all off-site street improvements <br />qualified as traffic impact fee eligible projects. <br />Based upon assessment, the appropriate fee credit would be $353,456 for the subject <br />Developer. Under this approach, the Developer is entitled to a credit against actual fees <br />assessed under the current schedules. This would render the Developer's remaining <br />acreage traffic fee satisfied given the proposed developments and current fee <br />schedules. <br />Financial Impact <br />Because the strict application of the City's Ordinances appears to present a more <br />favorable outcome for the Developer, the Ad Hoc Committee's recommendation is to <br />apply the Developer's basic formula for calculating traffic impact fees. This formula is <br />as follows: $266.50 per residential unit in CFD 89-2 and $1,066.00 per commercial acre <br />in CFD 89-2. <br />5of7 <br />