Laserfiche WebLink
Following is a summary of the estimated financial results of the Big League Dreams proposal versus other City <br />alternatives: <br />Big League Dreams City Staff Operated City Staff Operated <br />22 acres 22 acres 11 acres <br />Annual Debt Service $801,000 $765,000 $465,000 <br />Annual Maintenance 0 $350,000 $200.00 <br />Gross Annual Costs $801,000 $1,115,000 $665,000 <br />Less: <br />Tax Revenue (10 year average) ($300,000) $0 $0 <br />Lease Revenue (10 year average) ($280,000) $0 _ $ <br />Net Annual Cost <br />(10 year average) 221 00 1.115.000 <br />As evidenced by the above estimates, the Big League Dreams proposal is clearly the most cost effective alternative for <br />the City. In addition, the aesthetic benefits and positive impact on the community create a very beneficial situation, which <br />is difficult to quantify in economic terms. <br />As part of the agreements, Big League Dreams provides consulting services during the planning and construction phases <br />of the project to assure adherence to the proprietary nature of their product and assist the City in obtaining a quality sports <br />park. They are not the developer or contractor. They will assist the City during the process of public bidding for the <br />architectural and construction components of the project. Their consultant fee for this phase of the project plus <br />consultation during construction amounts to $420,000 and is included in the $8.9 million project cost estimate. Of this <br />amount, $30,000 has previously been paid to Big League Dreams pursuant to City Council approval. The balance of <br />$390,000 is payable at $41,000 per month for the first six months after approval of the agreement(s), and $16,000 per <br />month over the following nine months. Big League Dreams asserts that the consulting fees are used to help offset initial <br />staff training and start-up costs which are incurred solely by them in the amount of approximately $600,000. <br />Big League Dreams has constructed facilities in Cathedral City and Mira Loma. Another facility is under construction in <br />Chino Hills. They are in the planning stages with Redding, Manteca, and Yakima, Washington. Big League Dreams has <br />a proven track record along with the aforementioned national exposure and marketing capabilities. <br />The Parks, Recreation, and Family Services Commission has toured the Cathedral City and Mira Loma sites and will be <br />available during this presentation for any questions of them that may occur. <br />While approval of these agreements obligates the City to Big League Dreams regarding the aforementioned consulting <br />fees, there are still numerous actions necessary over the next several months to result in final project approval by the City <br />Council. These include, but are not limited to, environmental assessments and findings, public bidding and award of bids, <br />debt financing matters, and final land acquisition details. <br />In summary, after nearly two years of research and work regarding a suitable site and negotiations with Big League <br />Dreams, it is staff's contention that this proposal is the best alternative for delivering a long-term quality sports park to the <br />Colton Community. <br />FINANCIAL IMPACT <br />A Large portion of this report is concerned with financial impact, and it would be redundant to repeat the verbiage within <br />this section of the report. However, in summary, the key fiscal aspects of approving these agreements include a <br />maximum annual cost to the General Fund approximating $800,000, which is expected to be offset by additional average <br />annual revenues approximating $580,000 over the next ten years. The net estimated annual financial impact over the <br />next two years has been included within the approved 2001-03 budget. The net estimated annual General Fund cost of <br />$221,000 over the next ten years compares favorably to other alternatives which range from $665,000 to $1,115,000 <br />