Laserfiche WebLink
4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />-1.9 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />0M <br />28 <br />elevations for all other proposed development in the city. Only plans for the development of a <br />single-family detached dwelling including accessory buildings, and minor additions or alterations <br />to existing structures which do not change the external appearance nor increase the <br />intensification of use of the structure, shall be exempt from such a review. The committee and <br />the planning commission shall approve or conditionally approve site plans and elevations for a <br />proposed development, except where they make one or more of the following findings: <br />a. The provisions for vehicular parking and for vehicular and <br />pedestrian circulation on the site, and onto adjacent public right-of-way will create safety <br />hazards; <br />b. The bulk, location and height proposed will be detrimental <br />or injurious to other development in the neighborhood or will result in the loss of or damage to <br />unique natural or topographic features of the site that are important to the environmental quality <br />of life for the citizens of Colton, and the development is feasible in a manner that will avoid such <br />detrimental or injurious results or such loss or damage; <br />C. The provisions for on-site landscaping do not provide <br />adequate protection to neighboring properties from detrimental features of the proposed <br />development that could be avoided by adequate landscaping; <br />d. The provisions for exterior lighting are either inadequate for <br />human safety or will diminish the value and/or usability of adjacent property; <br />e. The exterior design of the buildings and structures will be <br />injurious or detrimental to the environmental or historic features of the immediate neighborhood <br />in which the proposed development is located and will cause irreparable damage to property in <br />the neighborhood, to the city and to its citizens; <br />f. The proposed development will impose an undue burden <br />upon off-site public services, including sewer, water and streets, which conclusion shall be based <br />upon a written report of the city engineer; and there is no provision in the capital works program <br />of the city to correct the specific burden within a reasonable period after the development will be <br />completed. <br />City 4. Signs. The director shall review applications for all signs within the <br />height,, lighting and movement of any sign <br />may be proportional to the size and/or intensification of use of any given development. <br />5. Determination of Appropriate Environmental Documents to be <br />Prepared Pursuant to CEQA. The director shall direct city staff regarding the appropriate <br />document(s) to prepare on each proposed development for commission and/or council review <br />and certification pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Where the project <br />is deemed to be exempt from environmental review pursuant to CEQA by categorical exemption <br />of the state EIR guidelines, the director shall make such findings and file all required forms. <br />6. Approval of Site Plan Review Within a Specific Plan Area. In cases <br />where all standards criteria and guidelines specified by the commission, or as listed within a <br />speck plan, are met, the committee shall have the power to approve any site plan review or, <br />sign application. <br />7. Grading Permits. The committee shall review all applications for <br />grading permits to assure that the proposed grading will not be environmentally detrimental. <br />-4- <br />