Laserfiche WebLink
2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />l <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />of the subject property does not qualify as a "project" as defined in State CEQA Guidelines <br />section 15378. First, Section 15378 defines a project as an activity that "has a potential for <br />resulting in either a direct physical change in the environment, or a reasonably foreseeable <br />indirect physical change in the environment." (State CEQA Guidelines, § 15378(a).) Here, <br />the action is to summarily vacate the subject property and potentially sell it to the <br />neighboring owner, which will not result in either a direct physical change in the <br />environment or a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment. <br />Accordingly, the action is not a "project" subject to CEQA. (State CEQA Guidelines, § <br />15060(c).) Second, Section 15378 explicitly excludes from its definition of "project" the <br />following: "organizational or administrative activities of governments that will not result in <br />direct or indirect physical changes in the environment." (State CEQA Guidelines, § <br />15378(b)(5).) The action to summarily vacate and sell the subject property constitutes an <br />organizational or administrative activity that will not result in a physical change in the <br />environment, and it therefore is not subject to CEQA. Further, this Resolution does not <br />constitute a binding commitment to develop any particular project or any particular use of <br />the subject property. <br />NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF <br />COLTON AS FOLLOWS: <br />SECTION 1. That the findings and determinations reflected above are true and correct and are <br />incorporated by this reference herein as the cause and foundation for the action taken by and <br />through this Resolution. <br />SECTION 2. In accordance with Streets and Highways Code sections 8330 et. sec ., the City <br />Council finds that the right of way property located at 910 Hert St., between Hert St. and La <br />Cadena Drive, said property being described in attached Exhibit "A", within the City of Colton, <br />San Bernardino County, State of California, is unnecessary for present or prospective street or <br />highway purposes, and hereby approves the summary vacation of the same. <br />SECTION 3. If any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this Resolution <br />is declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be unconstitutional or otherwise invalid, such <br />decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Resolution. <br />SECTION 4. The City Clerk shall cause a certified copy of this resolution to be recorded in the <br />Office of the San Bernardino County Assessor -Recorder -Clerk, attested by the Clerk under seal. <br />PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 1 <br />26 111 LJ 1 . <br />27 <br />SAAC S <br />28 City Clerk <br />J. <br />DAY OF APRIL 2025. <br />