Laserfiche WebLink
2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />WHEREAS, the City Council has found that this Development Agreement is consistent <br />with the City's General Plan; and <br />WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that by entering into the Development <br />Agreement: (i) the City will promote orderly growth and quality development on the Property <br />in accordance with the goals and policies set forth in the General Plan; (ii) significant benefits <br />will be created for City residents and the public generally from increased employment, property <br />tax revenue, and contributions from Developer toward public capital improvements; and <br />WHEREAS, the City and Developer have reached mutual agreement and desire to <br />voluntarily enter into the Development Agreement to facilitate development of the Project <br />subject to conditions and requirements set for therein; and <br />WHEREAS, previously, on June 20 and July 18, 2023, City Council adopted <br />Resolution Nos. R-6-23 and R-73-23, which approved the Tentative Parcel Map No. 20358 and <br />other related project approvals, including Ordinances Nos. 0-06-23 and 0-05-23 and the <br />approval and adoption of the Initial Study/15183 Analysis pursuant to Public Resources Code <br />section 21083.3 and State CEQA Guidelines section 15183 ("15183 Analysis"); and <br />WHEREAS, subsequently, the San Bernardino Superior Court (Case No. <br />CIVSB2317228) issued a peremptory writ of mandate, directing the City of Colton to void, <br />vacate, and set aside the approvals set forth in Resolution Nos. R-6-23 and R-73-23, and any <br />other resolutions related to the project, and further directed that prior to City Council taking any <br />action with regard to issuance of any approvals related to Resolution Nos. R-60-23 and R-73- <br />23, the City shall conduct a mitigation analysis as it pertains to operational air quality impacts <br />pursuant to the Court's June 3, 2024 ruling and State CEQA Guidelines section 15183; and <br />WHEREAS, on February 3, 2025, City Council adopted Resolution No. R-04-26, to <br />void, vacate, and set aside the approvals set forth in Resolution Nos. R-60-23, R-73-23, R-15- <br />24, R-16-24, and R-17-24 and Ordinances Nos. 0-06-23 and 0-05-23; and <br />WHEREAS, in order to address the peremptory writ of mandate in Case No. <br />CIVSB2317228, the City prepared a revised 15183 Analysis, in accordance with the provisions <br />of the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"); and <br />WHEREAS, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15183, projects which are <br />consistent with the development density established by existing zoning, community plan, or <br />general plan policies for which an EIR was certified shall not require additional environmental <br />review, except as might be necessary to examine whether there are project -specific significant <br />effects which are peculiar to the project or its site; and <br />WHEREAS, IDI Agua Mansa, LLCis seeking City approval to allow for the <br />construction of a new warehouse/office building at 1400 Agua Mansa Road and developer IDI <br />Logistics is seeking City approval to allow for the construction and operation of a new <br />warehouse/office buildings at 1500 Agua Mansa Road ("Project");and <br />