My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
(2)AR 081908 Appeal - Pacific Rail Industries
Colton
>
CITY CLERK
>
City Council Agendas
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000 - 2009
>
2008
>
08/19/2008 06:00 PM
>
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
>
Appeal - File Index No. DAP-000-794
>
AND PLACE FIXED TO CONSIDER AN APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S APPROVAL OF A MODIFICATION OF FILE INDEX NUMBER DAP 000-794, PACIFIC RAIL INDUSTRIES 785 EAST "M" STREET, COLTON.
>
(2)AR 081908 Appeal - Pacific Rail Industries
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/23/2014 7:48:15 AM
Creation date
2/19/2014 11:46:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Agenda Item
Item Number
1
Submitted On
8/14/2008
Submitted By
Sabdi Espinoza
Item Title
AR 081908 Appeal - Pacific Rail Industries
ATRequest
2385
Status (2)
2
Department
City Clerk
Meeting Date
8/19/2008
Meeting Time
6:00:00 PM
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The staff report is very skimpy on information and leads one to believe that <br />the applicant will have all the answers when the fluff starts spewing out of <br />the shredder. I believe that this conclusion has no merit. <br />I base this statement on the fact that Mr. Siroonian has never publicly stated <br />that he has operated a car shredder. Therefore, he is zero in car shredding <br />experience. I believe that he has no hazardous materials transporting <br />experience. I believe that Pacific Rail Industries has no registered drivers or <br />is certified to haul hazardous waste_ <br />Is there a need for specialized trucks to haul the toxic waste? I see no <br />requirements placed on the transporter trucks for certification, cleanliness, <br />debris tracking, spillage, leakage, or routing. It just talks about using <br />impervious tarps and hauling the fluff to Arizona. I found no drivers <br />licensing requirements. <br />It is very important to know that the state of California considers auto <br />shredder fluff a hazardous waste requiring special disposal. The staff report <br />does not make mention of PRI paying any hazardous materials generation <br />fees for the fluff. The staff report does not clearly call out the California <br />Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) authority for PRI to treat <br />auto shredder fluff. No written, detailed agreements with the waste receiving <br />entity (it is mentioned that the disposal site will be Arizona) or longevity of <br />the agreement is found in the staff report. <br />The project description and "in-line" treatment as described in the staff report <br />are only topical and add no clarity to the required treatments mentioned in the <br />EIR. All detail in treatments and management is left to the applicant's <br />"discretion." The staff report should be exact and detailed so their is no <br />misunderstanding as to who does what and which state and federal <br />regulations are applicable. The treatment, management, storage, and disposal <br />of this toxic waste must be clearly stated in the staff report so there will be no <br />mistakes made in protecting the community. The city will have to get this <br />right the first time out when the shredder starts working. <br />The newly built fluff storage building is a 3 walled affair and not an enclosed <br />structure. The staff report indicates an allowed 2 to 3 weeks storage of fluff <br />produced by the shredder. This calculates to 5,250 tons of shredder waste <br />stored in the structure if Mr. Siroonian decides to treat and store the fluff. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.