Laserfiche WebLink
Staff Report to the Mayor and City Council <br />Certification of Addendum to Agua Mansa Commerce Center Project EIR <br />December 15, 2009 <br />Page 3 <br />("Traffic Impact Analysis") (A.R., pp. 323-399) and the 895,520 square feet of High -Cube <br />Warehouse identified in the City's response to Rialto's comment in the City's April 22, 2008 <br />response to comments incorporated into the Final EIR (A.R., p. 2689). <br />There is one consistent set of square footage numbers used in the Project's Traffic Impact <br />Analysis and the EIR's traffic analysis. These numbers are: 1,086,782 square feet of High -Cube <br />Warehouse uses and 278,666 square feet for Industrial Park uses, for a total of 1,365,448 square <br />feet. <br />When responding to Rialto's EIR comment letter, the City mistakenly referred to the 895,520 - <br />square foot warehouse component line item in the legend of the conceptual site plan rather than <br />citing the correct total High -Cube Warehouse number of 1,086,782 used as the basis of all traffic <br />analyses. The environmental consultant also incorrectly cited the conceptual site plan for the <br />total square footage of the Project. The total square footage for the Project consistently used in <br />the Traffic Impact Analysis and the EIR's traffic analysis is 1,365,448 square feet, not 1,365,450 <br />square feet as stated in the conceptual site plan. <br />Both the Traffic Impact Analysis and the EIR's traffic analysis consistently used 1,086,782 as the <br />square footage allocated to High -Cube Warehouse (A.R., pp. 2144, 329, 347, 349). Thus, <br />although the incorrect number was used in the response to comments, it did not change the fact <br />that the correct number was used in the Project's Traffic Impact Analysis and the EIR. <br />(b) The Court also expressed concern about how the High -Cube Warehouse square footage for the <br />Project was determined. This number was based on the anticipated warehouse use of all <br />buildings over 100,000 square feet. Accordingly, consistent with industry standards and the <br />definition of High -Cube Warehouse, the Traffic Impact Analysis and EIR's traffic analysis for the <br />Project applied the High -Cube Warehouse trip generation rate to all buildings on the Property <br />greater than 100,000 square feet. As described in Rialto's own Request for Judicial Notice, the <br />County of San Bernardino Department of Public Works defines High -Cube Warehouses as <br />generally "greater than 100,000 square feet." The 100,000 square foot threshold for a High -Cube <br />Warehouse use has also been adopted by the San Bernardino Associated Governments <br />("SANBAG"). <br />The Traffic Impact Analysis and the EIR both accurately calculated the High -Cube Warehouse <br />trip generation rate for the Project based on industry standards as noted above. <br />The Addendum provides a more detailed clarification as to the square footage and methodology <br />used to reach the High -Cube Warehouse square footage calculations. <br />Court's Ruling: <br />Second, the Court found that the EIR was deficient in its explanation of the methodology used to calculate <br />thee traffic growth in the vicinity of the Project <br />Addendum - <br />In the Ruling, the Court stated that there was no evidence explaining how traffic from the Project was <br />incorporated into the traffic growth projections. <br />