My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
1993 AGN MAY 18 I21
Colton
>
CITY CLERK
>
City Council Agendas
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990 - 1999
>
1993
>
1993 May 18 Agenda Packet
>
1993 AGN MAY 18 I21
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/27/2014 3:33:00 PM
Creation date
2/20/2014 1:10:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General Documents
Created By
avillalba
DocType
General Documents
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
�'`l',. <br />`.__ Y <br />7'om Lasher <br />F?.O. Box 372 <br />I�ak� Arrowhead, <br />I)ear Mr. Lasher: <br />^"`� <br />LOUIS M. ZIGMAN <br />APtorney / Arbitrator <br />473 SOUTH HOLT AVENUE <br />LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90048 <br />(310) 556-3748 <br />FAX (310) 550-8439 <br />.� 28 <br />March 29, 1993 <br />CA 92352 <br />_�: .. . . _..: _.... <br />ATTACHMENT "A" <br />Re: City of Colton and IBEW Loca1 47 <br />(Case No. 92-3-157 - Dental Insurance) <br />7C r�ceived your fax message indicating your dissent and your <br />r.at�onale. <br />Xour. comments with respect to the "notice" were similar.to <br />fihe arguments made by the Union at the time of the hearing <br />�nd those arguments have already been considered. <br />With respect to your comments about the 1992 nec�otiations <br />�nd your personal invclvement in those negotiations and your <br />ata�ements as to what occurred, I have to point out that the <br />pan�l is limited to considering only testimony at the <br />hearing. It wauld be not only unfair to either party to � <br />��onaider "other evidence" which was not presented at the <br />hear.ing, but it would also violate due process if the`.panel <br />�aer� to consider such evidence_ ' <br />Ina�much you haven't raised any issues not previously <br />add�essed and inasmuch as the evidence with respect to the <br />a�egotiations issue wou3d n�t be ai�ow�u �u :;C ��.,sid���:3, � <br />hav�' issued the award, as a r�aj'ority opinion from myseif and <br />�the City's panel member. l <br />, <br />Sin�erely, ._.._._� <br />� <br />� <br />uis_ M. Zi : n <br />��c: Gordon R. Johnson <br />__ <br />_ _ , ,. �, ,�.. <br />� �- , �,�� ,�. �_ � �, �:. � - . � _„ � �. <br />� �_r , ..� _ _. .� ,, __._�. .�___ ._� . a � . . . -�,- .. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.