Laserfiche WebLink
r4l� CITY OF COLTON <br />POTENTIAL IMPACTS OF PROPOSITION 218 <br />COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICTS <br />The City has five Community Facilities Districts. The Community Facilities District special tax <br />will not be affected by this proposition pursuant to sections 5 (b) and/or (d). Section 5(b) exempts <br />existing assessments that were imposed pursuant to petition signed by the owners of the parcels at <br />the time the assessment was initially imposed. Section 5(d) exempts any assessment that received <br />majority voter approval from the voters in an election. <br />LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT <br />This assessment will not be affected by this proposition in as much as assessments are a benefit <br />assessment and are calculated and levied by zone. This is not a general tax. There is a specific <br />direct benefit to the property owners being assessed in each zone. Therefore, this assessment is <br />validated under section 4 of the proposition. <br />NPDES ASSESSMENT <br />This is a city-wide assessment. It does not provide a specific direct benefit to each assessed <br />property owner. Therefore, this assessment constitutes a general tai. Section 2c of the proposition <br />states that any general tax imposed without voter approval on or after January 1, 1995, shall <br />continue to be imposed only if approved by a majority vote of the voters at a general election. <br />Therefore, this assessment will need voter approval at the next general election, November 1998. <br />The 1996-97 assessment totals $535,316. <br />BUSINESS LICENSE TAX <br />The Business License Tar is a general tax and has not been increased since 1991. The original tax <br />was not voted on. Although it does not appear the original tax is subject to the proposition, the <br />language in section 2c is unclear. If the original tax is affected, the impact would be an <br />approximate $570,000 annual loss of revenue to the general fund. <br />1����►I.�1_i]�IL�ZKKi17:\�[�l'�11I:`:1 <br />The transient occupancy tax is a general tae. The current rate is 10% and has not been increased <br />since 1992. The original tax was not voted on. Although it does not appear the original tax is <br />subject to the proposition, the language in section 2c is unclear. If the original tax is affected, the <br />impact would be an approximate $114,500 annual loss of revenue to the general fund. <br />FRANCHISE FEES <br />The City provides Water, Sewer and Refuse to its residents. The General fund collects a 5% <br />Franchise Fee based on these services. Sections 6(b)(1)(2) state that revenues derived from fees <br />and charges shall not exceed the amount required to provide the property related service and shall <br />not be used for any other purpose than that for which they were imposed. Normally, the franchise <br />fee is considered a cost of doing business, but the wording in Sections 6(b)(1)(2) is unclear as to <br />whether this covers franchise fees. The potential impact would be an approximate $352,000 <br />�,, annual loss of revenue to the general fund. <br />