Laserfiche WebLink
1;3-�tiS-555'� <br />ENV. SVCS. PAGE 03/04 <br />Legislative Intent <br />"This bill is intended to provide voters with the option to establish a permanent` <br />and dependable source of revenue for local govemment in order to preserve and <br />maintain public safety, public infrastructure, libraries and park facilities. <br />Local government hw the resporssibility to provide safe communities by funding <br />police, fire and emergency medical. services. The loss of revenue over the last 18 <br />years has resulted in a local government financing crisis which risks the <br />reduction of essential services including public safety. Taxpayers have demanded <br />accountability, control of spending, and a return on their tax dollar investment. <br />This bill will provide the voter with the opportunity to determine general need <br />and the potential to directly benefit from tax dollars paid locally. <br />This bill provides voters with the option of reducing the state sales tax rate by 1 %� <br />and adding a 1`7o rate for cities and counties. This bill enables cities and counties <br />to put the sales tax rate change before voters. If approved by majority vote, the <br />rate change would be phased -in over 5 years commencing July 1, 19913--.20% the <br />first year, .40% the 5econc year, .6010 the third year, .80% the fourth year, and 1.0% <br />the fifth year each year thereafter. The rate change would only go into effect in <br />those jurisdictions whose voters approved the measure. The revenue resulting <br />from the rate change would be placed into a special fund and allocated only to <br />those cities and counties whose voters approved the measure. The funds would <br />be allocated based on population. Only the populations' of those cities and <br />counties whose voters approved the measure would be used in calculating the <br />revenue distribution. <br />In effect, this bill provides voters within cities and counties the option to change <br />the allocation of sales tax revenue so that cities and counties may receive general <br />fund -revenue from an additional 1% of the sales tax rate without a tax increase. <br />The per capita distribution method. will likely reduce the fiscalization of land use <br />decisions and conflicts amongst cities for big box retailers as well as stimulate <br />more housing development: <br />The additional intent of this bill is to increase voter participation in how general <br />tax revenues are distributed where taxpayer willingness "to pay more is lacking. <br />This voter participation bill responds to the problem created by the highpublic <br />demands for city services vis a vis: (1) current distribution of general fund <br />revenues (property taxes, sales taxes, income taxes); (2) constitutional fina"C"19 <br />restrictions as evidenced by Propositions 13, <br />62 and 218; and (3) taxpayer <br />confusion about where their tax dollars are going. <br />This bill isnot intended to impact education funding and stipulates that revenue <br />redistributed through a voter-appToved sales tax rate change not affect the state's <br />general fund obligation as required .by Proposition 38. This bill also stipulates <br />that the state be respomible for its Proposition 98 obligation in a manner that <br />dozes 'not affect local government revenue levels Or increase to�cai government <br />service burdens." <br />