Laserfiche WebLink
41 1 OWEN 9098748973 P.12 <br />STATEMENT of REASONS <br />FOR ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION <br />OBJECTtNG TO TAX SALE <br />RECOMMENDATION. Staff rccommendsuhat the City Council adopt (Ile enclosed resolution <br />formally objecting to the tax sale of cedain real property loc&t,d <br />District No. 90-1 for purpoges within CORIMUnity Facifitleq <br />of Presc-rying the city's lien of the delinquent cial t sp-Xes O"Ved to <br />such Community racilities District. . %, % <br />BACKGROUND.- In 1990, the City fOnned 'Comnaunity Fa6lities District No. go. -I for the <br />Purpose Offmancing certain public infraitlucturc in. cunl=don with the Las C,lorjas shopping t„ellter. <br />The City issued special Tax bondspunuantto the, <br />M <br />L _ ello-Ross CommllnitY Facilities Act for tlle <br />PuXPON offmmeins those improvements. in connection with the bond issue, the City cove nanted , <br />for the benefit of tile bondholders, that it would Me and pursue foreclogure actions in the avlmt that <br />any property owner failed to pky the special taxes when deco. One Of the owners (Lebanoff- <br />N14QKnight Gencral Partu.-rship), never paid any taxes mdthfi:t the District. The City theref0tr filed <br />a foreclosure complaint and obtained judgment in 1995. The City also ' Mccessfully defended the <br />cross-ComPlaint filed against it by Lebanoff-McKxdght- Appamnitly, Lebanoff-MeKlug IIt di,J no t <br />pay certain ad valorem es property taxtoe CO . [aunty -ill connectionwith its Ownership of the subject <br />prvperty, As a rmult, the City's 9pecial counsel receivede attached of Int t S <br />Dlaulted Pmperty­ thtthd "ent o ell Tic <br />ef <br />with respect to each of the three (3) Parocls which -ACrc the Subject Of the <br />foreclosure action. The tax sale is scheduled to be held on March 3, 1997 and March 4, 1997. <br />'Undcr Rcvenue and Taxatior, Code section 3712, the Tax Collector's deed will colivey title <br />to ally purchaser, free of all encumbmces Of an kind existing before the safe, except for certain <br />entimeratcd cxccptions. 0Dc Of the exceptions is on account of any lien fbr installments of taxes and <br />sPccial assessments which become payable after the time of gale. (Rev. & Tax. §3 712(a)) Another <br />excePtiot, preservc5 the interest of delincluciit special assessments levied under the Tmp v 11 <br />Borid Act of 1915. (Re -v, & Tax. § 3712( , ro el ent <br />,0) There is no Similar provision for delinquent: Wlo-Rocs <br />SpMial taxes. There is, however, an exception for "the lien for taxes or assessments or other lights <br />of ally taxing agency which does not consent to the sale under [this] chapter.” It is therefore <br />important that the City, in order to presetyc the lien Of (the &Jiuquent installments of special =cs <br />levied in CFD 90-1, not consent to the salt, To do so would potentially =eel the film for the <br />delinquent special taxes and might arguably violatv a duty to the bondholders, <br />Under Revenue and Taxation Godc scction 3695, consent is imputed unlcss the City adopts <br />a resolution objecting to the sale and delivers certifled copies thereof to the Board of Supervisors and <br />the'rreasurer-Tax Collector of the County, at least one day before the date of sale. That section <br />provides, in pertinent part, as follows, <br />"If the governing body Of any W-tng agency does not, before. the date of Elle <br />with the Tax Collector and the l3oard Of Superyi3ors, cAutified copies of a resolution <br />