Laserfiche WebLink
CITY OF COLTON DUPLICATE <br />AGENDA REPORT FOR COUNCIL MEETING OF MAY S, 1997 <br />TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers <br />APPROVAL: Malik Freeman, City Manager <br />FROM: Anna A. Vega, Finance Director <br />Q�_X�� <br />SUBJECT: Community Services Department Contract Pledging Direct <br />Deposit Payments for Low Income Utility Households. <br />DATE: <br />April 8, 1997 <br />BACKGROUND <br />Over the years the City -Utility Division has accepted payments from federal and state <br />assistance programs. These payments are on behalf of low-income households who are <br />falling short on their utility payments. <br />One of those programs is the Home Energy Assistance Program (HEAP). This is federally <br />funded and assists with heating and cooling costs only. The second is Community Services <br />Department (CSD). This state program handles the Energy Crisis Intervention Program <br />(ECIP) which administers payments for emergency utility assistance. <br />DISCUSSIONIANALYSIS <br />This year CSD changed the manner of processing their utility assistance payments. This <br />change consisted of the checks issued by Sacramento now going directly to the utility <br />customer. Previously they were mailed to the City directly. <br />Due to this change, staff elected to stop accepting pledges from CSD for utility customers. <br />It was determined that there was uncertainty whether the City would receive the check that <br />was pledged by CSD and mailed to the customer. However, staff has worked with CSD to <br />find an alternative solution. It was determined that payments can be re-established through <br />a wire transfer directly to the City's bank account. <br />There are currently sixteen California utility companies participating in the direct payment <br />process. They are: City of Pasadena, City of Riverside and Southern California Edison, to <br />mention a few. <br />Since the implementation of the direct payment process, the participating utility companies <br />have reported: <br />1. Decrease in lobby traffic <br />2. Reduced banking costs due to the reduction in the number of HEAP and ECIP <br />checks processed. <br />Item # 9 <br />