Laserfiche WebLink
SECTION IV <br />RECOMMENDATIONS <br />Each of the alternatives are summarized as follows: <br />Alternative No. Estimated Capital Cost <br />1 $75,000 <br />2 $130,000 <br />3 $240,000 <br />4 $1,400,000 <br />Since Alternative No. 4 is much more expensive than the other alternatives, we have eliminated it from <br />further consideration. In addition, since Alternative No. l requires installation of individual pressure <br />regulators by customers and does not reduce the water pressure within the City's system,we have also <br />eliminated it from further consideration. To reduce the pressure within the Mohave area and the Matich <br />` Development Phase I, we recommend Alternative No. 2' at an estimated capital cost of $130,000. <br />Prior to making any pressure changes in zones we recommend that ' <br />g P at City staff review the... modifications with <br />property owners to alert them of the, proposed changes in system pressures. In addition, we recommend <br />that City staff review proposed revisions with California Department of Health Services (CDHS) staff and <br />obtain their approval prior to initiating any changes with regard to CDHS. We would especially be <br />g P Y <br />concerned about the recommended alternative (Alternative No. 2) resulting in four short dead-end <br />waterlines in Malibu Court, East Topanga Way, East Carbon Court, and East Bryce Court; dead -ends <br />result in additional maintenance requirements (i.e. flushing) that do not exist with looped systems. <br />IV -1 <br />