My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
1998 AGN JUL 21 I02
Colton
>
CITY CLERK
>
City Council Agendas
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990 - 1999
>
1998
>
1998 July 21 Agenda Packet
>
1998 AGN JUL 21 I02
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/25/2014 1:23:51 AM
Creation date
2/20/2014 2:15:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General Documents
Created By
cityclerk
DocType
General Documents
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 2 <br />Water Rate Increase <br />Utilities Commission Meeting of April 27, 1998 <br />The Master Plan identifies projects amounting to $15.8 million to be completed between now and the end <br />of the year 2000. These improvements are to enhance the service to customers from the existing water <br />system, raise the reliability of the water production and delivery system, and to satisfy the anticipated <br />growth over the next ten years. <br />In order to generate the $15.8 million to complete the capital improvement program, two options are <br />available to the City. First, retail rates could be raised at some level to create a capital improvement fund. <br />At $500,000 per year, it would take approximately 30 years to raise the $15 million identified by Staff, and <br />the consultant. Obviously, at that rate, other system components would be in need of repair before the <br />initial projects were completed. Second, the City could issue debt to fund the capital improvement <br />program. This ensures that funds to complete the program are available at the beginning, and throughout, <br />the term of the construction program. This approach also includes a rate increase to cover the costs of <br />the borrowed funds, much in the same magnitude as the internally funded program. <br />ALTERNATIVES <br />The first alternative is always to do nothing. The utility could operate as it has for the past few years and <br />hope that there are no major failures of the water system, which could impair or halt our ability to produce <br />and deliver safe, reliable water service to the water customers. Clearty, this is not the alternative <br />proposed by Staff and would be frowned upon by the State Department of Health Services and our <br />consulting engineers. <br />The second, and preferred alternative, is to issue bonds for the improvements. Revenue bonds could be <br />issued by the City to fund the Capital Improvement Program to be expended over three years. <br />Repayment of the bonds would occur over a 25 -year period. <br />Obviously, the preferred option is to raise rates to create a capital improvement fund. Otherwise it would <br />take several years to accrue enough cash to fund even the first major project. Though this option exists, it <br />is not viable for providing an effective way to deal with the system needs. <br />Attached is a five-year financial forecast of the revenue requirements for the Water Utility. Simply put, this <br />forecast indicates that a 20% general rate increase is necessary to become effective July 1, 1998, to <br />proceed with a major portion of the recommended Capital Improvement Program. The increase would <br />primarily be required to assure adequate funds to cover the new debt service for the Capital Improvement <br />Program. At this time, there are no other significant changes in operating costs projected for the utility. <br />Operational and maintenance costs have stabilized and Staff sees no radical change from the current <br />level of operations. A rate increase of this magnitude would provide adequate coverage of the debt and <br />create a cash flow which would fund operations and provide for a modest reserve margin over the next <br />four years. Even with this increase, the forecast indicates that further adjustments may be necessary <br />during FY2001-02 in the range of 15 percent. It is difficult to say with any certainty whether other factors <br />may come into play that will affect this projection. <br />The 20% increase would result in an average monthly residential water bill (30 ccf) going from $29.38 to <br />$35.26, an increase of $5.88. Of course, this difference would vary depending on the amount of water <br />used, but the percentage change would be constant. Staff is not recommending any change in the design <br />of the water rates. Presently there is no supporting data to indicate that the current design is unfair in the <br />allocation and recovery of the revenue requirements. Even following the rate change, residential <br />customers will only be paying $0.0016 per gallon of water. <br />Item No. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.