Laserfiche WebLink
SEW By: 6- 3-99 : 2:22PM : BEST BEST & KRIEGER 90937051544 5/11 <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />e <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />2e <br />one payment of $345.00 was received by the City. No additional payments <br />were received until after the initiation of revocation proceedings. (Based on <br />Agenda Report, Exhibits 211, 2C & 2D and Testimony of Mr. DeAlwis) <br />3. In accordance with the conditions of approval, the Rocks Club was required to <br />secure a reciprocal parking agreement to provide more parking spaces for the <br />• Rocks Club. (Based on Fibbit 2D) The agreement was required to be in <br />recordable form with a copy to the City Clerk for recordation with the County <br />at the expense of the Rocks Club. The requirement for recordation of the <br />document was meant to inform subsequent purchasers of the Rocks Club, as <br />well as surrounding commercial uses on the same property as the Rocks Club <br />that much of the parking was encumbered by the Rocks Chtb. (Based on <br />Explanation by S. Carvalho) Although the evidence established that a lease <br />agreement containing the required parking arrangements was executed, no <br />recordable copy of the lease document was presented to the City Clerk for <br />recordation or recorded by the Applicant. (Based on Agenda Report, Exhibit <br />2D and Testimony of Mr. Zamora) <br />Moreover, the oral and written evidence presented and discussed in Finding A, above, <br />further demonstrates that Rods Club has been conducted in a disorderly manner. <br />C. During their deliberations on this matter, the City Council indicated that <br />suffteient evidence was presented to find and determine, by a preponderance of the evidence, that <br />the conduct of.the Rocks Club does not, or will not, comport with the pubGe welfare and that the <br />Club has been conducted in an illegal, improper or disorderly manner. The following reasons discussed <br />by individual cduncilmerabcrs in support of the decision to revoke the Dance Permit are summarized <br />below and are hereby incorporated as additional findings for revocation: <br />a. Understood that the Applicant bad a significant investment in the Chub, <br />but that revocation of the Dance Permit does not mean the Applicant must <br />cease operations. The Applicant may continue to operate as a sports bar and <br />rd <br />