Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />2 <br />J <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21' <br />22 <br />2J <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />RESOLUTION NO. R-29-99 <br />A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF <br />COLTON, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE SUPPLEMENTAL <br />AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE COUNTY OF SAN <br />BERNARDINO AND THE CITY OF COLTON ELIMINATING <br />THE FEBRUARY 11, 1999 CRIMINAL JUSTICE <br />ADMINISTRATIVE FEE INCREASE <br />WHEREAS, the Criminal Justice Administrative Fee (booking fee) was enacted <br />to help mitigate the impact of the State's $431 million reduction of support to counties <br />in 1990, and since being enacted has been the subject of extensive litigation in which <br />Colton has participated along with other cities in the County; and, <br />WHEREAS, Colton and other cities have signed a booking fee settlement <br />agreement with the County and these settlement agreements call for an annual fee <br />increase based upon the Consumer Price Index (CPI) to be implemented on February <br />1 l'hof each year through the year 2000; and, <br />WHEREAS, Colton recently joined with other cities in the County to ask the <br />County Board of Supervisors to repeal booking fees; and, <br />WHEREAS, the County board of Supervisors denied the request to repeal <br />booking fees citing that it would create a financial hardship for the county since the fee <br />generates approximately $4 million annually; and, <br />WHEREAS, a meeting was held between county staff, city managers, and <br />police chiefs where it was agreed that alternatives would be explored for mitigating <br />booking fees while ensuring the roll back is revenue neutral to the County; and, <br />WHEREAS, waiving the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for one year is a first step <br />in what will be an ongoing process to identify mutually agreeable alternatives to <br />reducing the booking fee; and, <br />WHEREAS, cities who receive the fee reduction will have agreed to allocate to <br />local law enforcement programs the entire amount of their savings derived from the fee <br />reduction; and, <br />I <br />