Laserfiche WebLink
� <br />City of Colton <br />Agenda Report <br />Gouncil Me�ting af Clctober 26, 1999 <br />Page 2 <br />Team reviewed the study and discussed the methodologies used for calculating each <br />of the types of proposed development fees, as well as for existing fees. <br />DISCUSSI�NIANALYSIS: <br />Topping Jacquess Consultants (the "Consultants") conducted an analysis of <br />developm�nt impact mitigation fees currently in place and identified additional <br />infrastruct�are and public service categories for which there currently exists no <br />developm�nt �mpact mitigation fee. Currentiy, the city assesses development fees for <br />parks, sewer, water, storm drainage fees (in two locations) and traffic. Additiona( <br />facilities and public services that were identified where development fees are currently <br />net collected but should be are for police station, fire station, library and civic center <br />improvements. <br />The Study contains an in-depth analysis of six infrastructure and public service <br />categories: Civic Center, Fire Station, Library, Parks Police Station and Traffic. Water <br />and Sewer fees were not included in this analysis because the Utility Department was <br />in the process of updating its Water and Wastewater Master Plan at the time the <br />Capital Infr�structure Study was conducted. Additionally, storm drainage fees were not <br />reviewed a� part of this study. The consultant did suggest however that a storm drain <br />study be undertaken at same point in time in concert with the County of San Bernardino <br />Flood Control District. <br />Based on �uture infrastructure needs, the study determined that the following costs <br />could be allocated and collected from new development for each infrast t <br />category: <br />Civic Center <br />Fire Station <br />Library <br />Parks <br />Police Station <br />Traffic <br />TOTAL <br />$1,264,151 <br />$1,750,180 <br />$2,278,Q64 <br />$7,441,824 <br />$2,452,616 <br />$24,535,482 <br />$39,722,317 <br />ruc ure <br />If enacted the propased development impact mitigation fees would be collected an a <br />per unit basis when new development occurs. None of the aforementioned fees would <br />be collected in from existing businesses or residents. The development unit is equal to <br />one dwelling unit for residential and 1000 square feet of building area for commercial <br />and industrial projects. <br />The Study dletermined thafi for the six infrastructure and public service categories listed <br />above the c�urrent level of service is below the desired level of service in all categories <br />except the fire station category. The cure far these existing deficiencies however, <br />cannot be made the responsibility of new development. <br />AB 1600 <br />Assembfy Bill 1600 (adopted in 1987) is the most commonly recognized legislation <br />dealing with the development fee issue. AB 1600 provides a detaifed set of regulations <br />. <br />_ ,_ _ ,_ � _ _ -: __ <br />� . <br />