2000 AGN MAR 21 I03_Appeal of PC Decision_DC-69-99

Browse Search

Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of February 8, 2000 Page 5 of 8 Commissioner Chavez expressed concern for the residents that live in the area. He stated that he- would like additional information on other businesses that were interested in locating into the vacant building. Vice -Chairperson Oliva inquired about the easement rights. Mr. Soto stated that legal documents regarding the easement rights have not been provided to Staff. Vice - Chairperson Oliva stated that she understood the homeowners concerns. She stated that she would like to see the Specific Plan for the area. She indicated that she believes competition is good for businesses and does not understand why those issues could not be worked out between the dealers. She stated that she would like to see something else locate into the building. Chairperson Vilches indicated that he also agrees with Commissioner Suchil. He stated that they must look at what is best for the area and that he does not believe this is the best thing for that location. Commissioner Suchil stated that he does not want this to appear as a personal attack on the business but that he does not feel this is the proper location for it. Commissioner Suchil moved to deny File Index Number DC -69-99; seconded by Commissioner Chavez, motion carried with Vice -Chairperson Oliva abstaining. Mr. Soto informed the applicant of their appeal rights. Commissioner Carter returned to the dais. 2. FILE INDEX NUMBER: DV -01-00 COBRA EQUIPMENT RENTALS Mr. Soto read the staff report indicating that the request is for a Major Variance to reduce the landscaping requirement of 25% of total lot area. He stated that on January 18, 2000, the DRC considered the proposed project and that the Committee recommends that the Commission approve the Major Variance with the Conditions of Approval. He indicated that staff concurs with the recommendation by the DRC. Mr. Soto stated that the proposed project is consistent with the intent and guidelines of the General Plan; the proposed project will be consistent with the Zoning Ordinance if it is granted a Conditional Use Permit and complies with the Conditions of Approval; special circumstances relating to the size of the property and approved land use warrant a Major Variance; and that the proposed project is compatible with the surrounding uses and is exempt under C.E.Q.A. Commissioner Prieto expressed concern about the request for reduced landscaping and stated that he does not understand how the applicant is being deprived enough to warrant a Major Variance. Mr. Soto explained the layout of the property and surrounding properties. Commissioner Prieto questioned what would be at the rear of the property.