Laserfiche WebLink
Page 2 of 2 <br />Agenda Report for July 16, 2002 <br />July 9, 2002 <br />Consequently, the PDT is recommending Alternative No. 1 because of the reasons listed above <br />and because it is also the only alternative that we estimate the project will fall within the <br />budget constraints. <br />The consultant firm conducted a workshop at the SANBAG office on May 6, 2002, to present the <br />alternatives to the respective Mayors, City Council Members and interested parties in <br />attendance from the cities of San Bernardino and Colton. At that workshop the elected officials <br />unofficially supported the PDT recommendation for the Hunts Lane Grade Separation. The City <br />of San Bernardino took similar action as requested here on June 17, 2002 supporting the <br />recommendation listed below. This requested action was coordinated with the Engineering <br />Department, reviewed by the DRC on July 1, 2002, and the Planning Commission on July 9, <br />2002. <br />Staff scheduled time for the consultants' presentation during the Presentation segment of the <br />City Council meeting on July 16, 2002, to further facilitate information and answer questions <br />regarding this project. <br />FINANCIAL IMPACT <br />There is no financial impact associated with this project. This project is 100% funded through <br />the State Transportation Congestion Relief Program (ICRP). Based on the preliminary <br />estimated costs, this project will receive up to $17,210,000.00. <br />ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT <br />A contract was previously issued to a consulting firm, LSA, Project Manager King Thomas, who <br />is preparing all the appropriate environmental documents. <br />RECOMMENDATION <br />Approve the recommended preliminary design alternative for the Grade Separation at Hunts <br />Lane. <br />Attachments: Location Map <br />Aerial Image <br />Evaluation Matrix <br />REVIEW TEAM <br />City Attorney: If Finance Director: <br />City Manager: OTHER: <br />