Laserfiche WebLink
Colton Utility Authority Meeting of January 21, 2003 <br />Wellhead Treatment of Well Nos. 15, 17, and 24 <br />Page 2 of 3 <br />a full surface water treatment train downstream of the reactor before the water can be considered safe for <br />human consumption. Because of the complexity, initial capital cost and space requirements, ex-situ <br />biological treatment was not considered acceptable at this time for Colton's three impacted wells. <br />Staff has reviewed proposals from three vendors who can provide wellhead treatment systems: Basin <br />Water Technologies, U.S. Filter Corporation, and Calgon Carbon Corporation. The proposals submitted <br />by U.S. Filter and Calgon Carbon both utilize a non-regenerable resin technology. The proposal submitted <br />by Basin Water Technology utilizes a regenerable resin. A synopsis of the proposals is tabulated below: <br />Basin Water Calgon U.S. Filter <br />Capital Cost $2,553,750 $1,415,889 $605,250 <br />CosUAcre Foot Treated- $350 $660 $435 <br />(All three wells combined) <br />Total First Year Annual Cost * $2,903,750 $2,075,889 $1,040,250 <br />' Based on 1000 AF per well. <br />Due to the fact that the wells are located in or adjacent to residential neighborhoods, staff has concerns <br />regarding the impact of the truck traffic that would occur every few days to replenish and dispose of the <br />brine associated with the regenerable brine type of system. The single pass resin also eliminates <br />concerns regarding the future availability and potential increased costs of brine disposal. Although the <br />Basin Water Technology proposal has a lower per-acre-foot cost, it would take 22.9 years of operation at <br />1000 AF annually to break even with the proposal provided by U.S. Filter due to the significantly higher <br />initial capital cost. <br />Until additional funding is obtained to support the ongoing costs of plume cleanup, the operation of these <br />wells and their associated treatment system would be limited to meeting peak system demand during the <br />summer months. Utilized in this manner, the impact to the current city water rate structure would be <br />insignificant. <br />In addition to the treatment system installation, some minor work will be necessary on each of the weils to <br />provide adequate pressure to the treatment system. <br />ALTERNATIVES <br />Continue to purchase water from the City of San Bernardino at a cost of $3000-$6000 per day during the <br />summer months to meet system demand. <br />Construct additional pipeline and pumping stations to improve conveyance capacity from the northeast part <br />of the city to the Western Pressure Zone. <br />Initiate mandatory water rationing or serve water that exceeds the action level for perchlorate and notify <br />the public. <br />FINANCIAL IMPACT <br />