Laserfiche WebLink
3. Creates an asset for the Chamber that they can leverage and possibly divide for rental space – creating <br />income for them. <br />D. Disadvantages <br />1. The City loses an asset. <br />2. The Chamber incurs additional costs by having to cover utility and maintenance expenses –further <br />challenging their financial capacity (however, this may be more than offset by rental income). <br />Alternative 2 <br />A. Lease the building to the Chamber for at least a 30 -year period at $1 per year. <br />B. Pay $50,000 in one-time relocation costs. <br />C. Advantages <br />1. City retains asset <br />2. Chamber does not incur additional operating expenses for utilities and maintenance. <br />D. Disadvantages <br />1. City retains liability. <br />2. City is responsible for ongoing utility and maintenance costs. <br />3. The Chamber does not gain an asset that they can leverage –thereby making rental opportunities for <br />additional income difficult. <br />All things considered, staff recommends Alternative 1. This restores equity to the original transaction and intent between <br />the City and the Chamber (the Chamber gets a building of equivalent value to $30,000 41 years ago) and eliminates the <br />City's ongoing liability and responsibility for operating costs. The Chamber also benefits by obtaining an asset they can <br />borrow against, rehabilitate, and rent out portions of for additional income. This alternative creates a better "arms -length" <br />relationship between the City and the Chamber relative to office space. <br />FINANCIAL IMPACT <br />Proposed relocation costs of $50,000 to be paid to the Chamber will be taken from the City Hall Remodel project budget, <br />which is being funded by excess "one-time" General Fund CIP reserves of at least $550,000. If Alternative 1 is approved <br />by the City Council, General Fund annual utility and maintenance costs will be reduced by approximately $12,000. If <br />Alternative 2 is approved there will be no reduction in General Fund annual costs. <br />ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT <br />This project/transaction is exempt under section 15301 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). <br />RECOMMENDATION <br />Direct staff to begin the process of preparing necessary legal documents for the transfer of ownership of the <br />building at 655 North LaCadena from the City of Colton to the Chamber of Commerce, and prepare all related <br />legal documents for items such as joint use parking and temporary leaseback, if necessary, to the City of a <br />portion of the building. <br />2. Authorize the payment of $50,000 to the Chamber of Commerce for relocation expenses to be released as <br />follows: <br />A. $10,000 on or before January 31, 2003 <br />B. $10,000 on or before April 30, 2003 <br />C. $30,000 upon Chamber's vacation of existing site <br />TEAM ONLY <br />rney:, 2,044 i-- Finance Director del— <br />i <br />