My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
2005 AGN JUL 19 I09
Colton
>
CITY CLERK
>
City Council Agendas
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000 - 2009
>
2005
>
2005 July 19 Agenda Packet
>
2005 AGN JUL 19 I09
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/27/2014 3:10:20 PM
Creation date
2/20/2014 6:02:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General Documents
Created By
avillalba
DocType
Agendas
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
tJ1NV O�'riC�! OF <br />�EBT BE''�i at KR�X#E�Fi LLP <br />C)n September 7, 200�4, the Resources Agency of�cially amended thc fotlowing <br />sections af the State CEQA Guideli�s: 15023, 15041, 15062, 15063, I5064,15064.5, 15065, <br />15075,15082, 15085,1 Sa87, 15U88, 15Q8$.5, 15094, 15097, 1512b.4, 15130, 1 S 152. 15183, <br />15205, 15206,15252,15313, 15325, 1533U, 15378, Apgendix C, aad Appendix D. The <br />Resoum,es A$ency also added two new pravisions to t3ie Guidelines, Section 15333 and <br />Appendix L. <br />The substance of these amendments was sumnaarized in the memorandum <br />provided to you in November 2Qt)4. Your ?rOQS Local GEQA Guidclines �avc been updated to <br />refl� thesc changes. <br />--.�.�.r _ _�_ _� _.�._ ��. ;� <br />2004 was a very active session for CEQA legislation. In all, the Legislature <br />passed and the Govemor signed ten bills relating to CEQA The text of these bills is sumnzarized <br />below. <br />Assembty BiU 3990 (AB 3U90) <br />AB 3090 requires that the CEQA Guidalines be revised to reflect the California <br />Supreme Court`s holding in Friends of Sierra Madre v. City of Sierra Madre, 25 C�i. 4th 165 <br />{2001). Previously, Secxion 15378 a�f the CEQA Ciuid�lines d�f'ines the "pmjects" tbat are not <br />subject to CEQA; this defuution excluded proposa�s that �re subrnitt� to � vote of the people <br />firom the CEQA review pra:ess. Public agencies had relied on this provision to put initiative <br />measures on the ballot without undertaking environmental review of the pot�ntial impacts of the <br />proposed new laws. in Friends of Sierra Madre, the �ourt ruled that Ehe Guidelincs' exclusion <br />of initistive..s spansored by public agcncies was overbroad. While initiatives placed on the ballot <br />due to voter-sponsored petition drives are exempt from CEQA review, uutiatives placed on the <br />ballot as a discmtionary docision of the public agency are not. <br />AB 3U90 also moved the provision requiring the Resourcees Agency to prepare <br />a�ndments to thc Stata GEQA Guidclines from Public Resources Code � 21083 to PubLic <br />Resources Code � 21087. The amend�ments are sti�l required to be prepared every two years. <br />As expleined beZow, the Resources Agency amended Section 15378 of the State <br />CEQA f3uidelines last September. The n�w language addresses the issue targeted by AB 3090. <br />�e have revised your Gu�delines to reflect the revisions made by the Rasources A�ency to the <br />State Guideiines, and no addit�onal revisions are necessary to bring your Guidelines into <br />compliance with this bill. <br />Assembly Bill 2814 (AB Z814) <br />AB 2814 relates to CEQA litigation proc�eduras. This bill clarifies that the <br />petitioner bringing a CEQA lawsuit i� require+d to name as defendants only the public agencies <br />that issued the approval and the recipients of tbe approv�l. Becausc AB 2814 relates only to <br />litigatioa proceduras, it dces not require any changes to your Guidelines. <br />-2- <br />u��o.� <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.