Laserfiche WebLink
Item #27 <br />REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY <br />AGENDA REPORT <br />FOR THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING OF JUNE 7, 2005 <br />TO: Honorable Agency Chairperson and Board Members <br />FROM: Candace Cassel, Redevelopment Direct) <br />SUBJECT: Authorization for the Executive Directo E end the Term <br />the Rancho Mediterrania "finished lot" Contracts by One Ye <br />Adjusting the Contract Amount in a Net Amount Not to Exce <br />$97,800 and Initiate formal bidding process and Subsegw <br />Agency Board Award of a Contract for Garage Doors <br />2005 <br />Background <br />In 1993, the Redevelopment Agency acquired Rancho Mediterrania as part of a litigation settlement. <br />The Agency's intent was to sell off each individual lot to low to moderate income households for the <br />purposes of maintaining and preserving low to moderate income housing units within the City. The <br />Agency reaffirmed its decision to continue with the lot sales program on February 11, 1999. At that <br />time, the Agency established minimum standards for the "finished lot" that it would sell: the <br />assessment district bond recorded against each lot would be paid off (approximately $12,000/lot); <br />the garage would be fully rehabilitated, including roofing, minimal electrical construction, a metal roll - <br />up garage door with an automatic garage door opener, and front yard landscaping with automatic <br />irrigation was be installed or rehabilitated. The Purchase and Sale Agreement for the sale of a lot <br />states that the Agency will complete the finished lot" improvements within 60 days of escrow <br />closing. <br />In May 2003, the Agency Board awarded contracts for the completion of the "finished lot" <br />improvements. In most cases, a contract for each trade was awarded to two contractors to ensure <br />availability of contractors to complete the improvements and to ensure quality standards. The <br />contracts were awarded based upon time and materials and were good for one year. It was <br />originally anticipated that the contract would cover projected sales of one hundred fifteen (115) lots: <br />ninety (90) vacant lots for new home placement, and twenty-five (25) tenant conversions. During <br />fiscal year 02/03 and 03/04, the Agency sold 114 lots; thirty-six (36) of the sold lots had obligations <br />for improvements remaining and sixty-six (66) Agency owned lots on which improvements were <br />anticipated when/if tenant homeowners purchased their land. <br />Contracts were awarded for eight trades: demolition of dilapidated homes, front yard landscaping, <br />garage roof, fencing, garage electrical, garage repair, garage door and hardscape removal and <br />installation. Table 1 identifies the contractor and the total amount awarded for each trade. The <br />contracts were awarded based on projected sales, on a "unit of construction" basis. Each "unit of <br />construction" consisted of materials and labor for certain components as appropriate for each <br />contract. Garage roofs for example included materials and installation for sheathing, shingles, felt, <br />cricket, and tear -off. The rehabilitation is specific to the level of deterioration when rehabilitation <br />