My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
1982 ADJ MTG MIN JUN 14
Colton
>
CITY CLERK
>
City Council Minutes
>
1981-1990
>
1982
>
1982 ADJ MTG MIN JUN 14
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/24/2014 6:00:58 AM
Creation date
2/20/2014 1:57:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General Documents
Created By
avillalba
DocType
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
BUDGET: <br />21T <br />Community Promotion <br />Acting City Manager Elliott reported the City Council had reuqested a report from <br />the Chamber of Commerce in regards to their proposed actiivites and that in that <br />light he had invited the Chamber to be present tonight and Reverend Richard Crane <br />is present. <br />Reverend Crane, President of the Chamber of Commerce, addressed the Council stating <br />each member had been given a Yellow Packet containing an up-to-date Financial State- <br />ment, Proposed Budget, and Proposed Program of Action. Reverend Crane Briefly re- <br />viewed the various documents and stated that in conversation with the Mayor, both <br />are of the opinion that of major importance is a good working relationship between <br />the Chamber and the City in order to create and promote a favorable business climate <br />in the City as a whole. <br />Councilwoman Garcia asked Reverend Crane about the establishment of a Sister City <br />Program and how he felt about that. <br />Reverend Crane stated that he highly supports such a program and feels that this <br />type of program would not be for the edification of the Chamber, but rather the <br />City. <br />Councilwoman Cisneros complimented the Chamber in providing the packet and their <br />budget. <br />Reverend Crane thanked the Council Members for being interested in what the Chamber <br />of Commerce is doing and in making the Chamber responsible for their request. <br />ELECTRIC UTILITY <br />Electric Utility Director Drews reported to the Council that at the time his budget <br />was proposed, it was a balanced budget and as the Council is aware, it is not now <br />balanced due to the rate increase passed by Edison. <br />Councilwoman Garcia and Councilman Rios questioned Mr. Drews with regard to the <br />various positions, their area of responsiblity and the supervision of the posi- <br />tions budgeted under his department. <br />Mr. Drews explained that his department operates on three crews out in the field, <br />plus meter readers, meter repair persons, and the supervisors for these individuals. <br />Mr. Drews reported he has requested a reclassification of one of the lineman posi- <br />tions to that of Lineman Working Foreman. <br />Mr. Elliott stated that he position of Lineman Working Foreman does not currently <br />exist, the position would habe to be created and recruited for and that it would <br />not add an additional person. The additional cost would be approximately $1,000. <br />annually. <br />Councilman Rios asked how many persons have to be on a repair job. <br />Director Crews responded that the number is mandated by State Law and calls for <br />4 - 5 men. <br />Ciscussion was held on the conversion to high pressure sodium lights, a savings of <br />50%, the possibility of going to contract for complete conversion at an early date <br />if this proves to be a cost savings. <br />Mr. Drews said the bottom line is the propsoed interim Rate Increase to allow for <br />a rate study, followed by the set increase in rates. To go without an increase <br />would mean that the City would be 1.5 million dollars short in this budget. <br />Mayor Huntoon requested that careful review be made of customers who are at the <br />lower end of the usage scale, to see what can be done to help people on fixed <br />income. <br />Discussion followed on the cost of going to once a month utility billing. Mr. <br />Elliott stated that a report would be forthcoming on this matter. <br />The possibility of amending the Electric Utility Customer Service Policy was dis- <br />cussed, with regard to extending the time on the payment of utility bills. Mrs. <br />Andengaard stated the final notice goes out to the customer 20 days after initial <br />bill and then the customer has 10 days from the final notice. <br />-2 y v'1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.