Laserfiche WebLink
City Attorney Edwards reported the County Office of Community Development has <br />2 0,1advised us that we have unexpended entitlement funds and that a HUD determination <br />has been made that so long as a project or projects remain active, and ongoing <br />progress is being accomplished, the City -County Agreement remains in effect <br />until such time that all projects are completed. <br />Mr. Edwards stated the City needs to advise the Board of Supervisors if we <br />choose to re -program the $300,000 currently allocated for a fire station. City <br />Attorney Edwards said HUD questions the Fire Station as an eligible project, as <br />they are of the opinion that the location of the station would not sufficiently <br />serve an adequate low and moderate income persons requirement. If the City is <br />going to re -program the $300,000 into an eligible project, such as sewers, it <br />must be done before July 1, 1982. <br />Council consensus was that more time was needed to study the Fire Station project <br />and weigh all the data. <br />Moved by Councilman Rios, seconded by Councilwoman Garcia, to hold the item over <br />to the next Council Meeting. Unanimous vote. <br />Finance <br />Audit <br />City Attorney Edwards reported that subsequent to his preparing the Agenda Report <br />in the Council's packet, a meeting was held with Mayor Huntoon, the firm of <br />Quezada, Navarro & Co., and him. Mr. Edwards stated that Quezada, Navarro & Co. <br />are in the process of completing the audit for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1981, <br />and that in order for the City to secure audit bids for the fiscal year ending <br />June 30, 1982, certain preliminary audit procedures need to be done immediately at <br />the close of June 30, 1982. Mr. Edwards continued that Quezada, Navarro & Co. <br />have offered to do this limited audit work for a fee of $350.00. <br />City Attorney Edwards stated that he had prepared a resolution on this matter <br />and that he would read it in full. <br />Moved by Councilman Rios, seconded by Councilwoman Garcia, to approve Resolution <br />No. 4215. Unanimous vote. <br />RESOLUTION NO. 4215 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLTON <br />AUTHORIZING THE EMPLOYMENT OF QUEZADA, NAVARRO & CO. TO <br />PERFORM AUDIT WORK. <br />ORDINANCE NO. 1623 <br />Second Reading <br />City Attorney Edwards presented Ordinance No. 1623, for second reading, reading <br />it as to number and title and stating this is the prezoning in the La Loma Hills <br />area. <br />Moved by Councilwoman Garcia, seconded by Councilman Rehrer, to adopt Ordinance <br />No. 1623. Unanimous vote. <br />ORDINANCE NO. 1623 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF COLTON AMENDING ORDINANCE <br />NO. 1602, AS AMENDED, AND PROVIDING FOR CERTAIN ZONE <br />RECLASSIFICATIONS. <br />ORAL COMMUNICATIONS: <br />Mr. Wes Hayden, 279 W. Litton, suggested that the $300,000 allocated for the <br />Fire Station be reprogrammed for the electric utility rate increase. <br />Staff advised Mr. Hayden that the $300,000 is from a Community Development <br />Block Grant Fund and must be used in eligible targeted areas. <br />Mr. Charles Jordan, 671 Carole Ct., stated he has resided in the City for 30 years <br />and he has the highest regard for the City's operations and in particular for <br />the Fire and Police Departments. Mr. Jordan was responding to comments made earlier <br />that operational mismanagement and waste were contributing factors to the high cost <br />of the electric utility. <br />CLOSED SESSION: <br />The City Council adjourned to Closed Session at 9:00 p.m., to discuss Matters <br />of Personnel and Litigation. The City Council reconvened at 9:52 p.m., all <br />members present. <br />City Attorney Edwards reported the City Council had considered the results of <br />the meetings between City representatives and those of the San Bernardino <br />v�.��s 11982 <br />