My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
1983 REG MTG MIN MAY 3
Colton
>
CITY CLERK
>
City Council Minutes
>
1981-1990
>
1983
>
1983 REG MTG MIN MAY 3
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/24/2014 6:06:49 AM
Creation date
2/20/2014 1:57:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General Documents
Created By
avillalba
DocType
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
3/7 <br />Dotson, O'Bryant & Crawford for their engineering services, the Agree- <br />ment being subject to prior review and approval by the City Attorney <br />as to form and content. <br />Mr. Aguilera concluded it is therefore recommended the Council author- <br />ize the City Manager to enter into an Agreement with Dotson, O'Bryant <br />& Crawford for engineering services. <br />Mr. Paul Welsh and Mr. Richard Navarro, representing the firm of <br />Inland Associates, addressed the Council Members stating their con- <br />cern over the fact that they were a well qualified firm for this type <br />of project, having done numerous jobs of this type for other cities, <br />the state, federal government, etc., they were the low bidder, and <br />they were not selected for this project. Mr. Welsh stated there is a <br />difference of $12,000 between their bid and that of Dotson, O'Bryant <br />& Crawford. <br />Mr. Dotson also spoke on behalf of his firm, stating that although he <br />does not want to belabor the issue, his proposal is available for re- <br />view by the Council Members and he would be happy to answer any ques- <br />tions. <br />Councilwoman Cisneros and Councilman Rios expressed their concern over <br />the difference of $12,000 between the two firms, stating it would ap- <br />pear that the firm of Inland Associates were also well qualified for <br />this project. <br />After additional discussion between Council Members and Staff, moved <br />by Councilwoman Cisneros, seconded by Councilman Rios, to refer this <br />matter back to Staff for additional review and report. Unanimous <br />vote. <br />The City Council took a five minute recess. <br />COMMUNITY SERVICES DIRECTOR'S REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: <br />Ordinance No. 1637 <br />Second Reading <br />Director of Community Services Joseph McGee stated Ordinance No. 1637 <br />is being presented for Second Reading, along with four alternative <br />sources for charging for the cost of the Pretreatment Program. Mr. <br />McGee said that Staff is again requesting direction from the Council <br />so that a Resolution can be prepared reflecting the City's wishes on <br />the methods of charging for service. <br />Mr. McGee also referred to a memorandum from the City Attorney advis- <br />ing the United States Environmental Protection Agency finds that <br />Colton's failure to adopt a pretreatment ordinance is a violation, and <br />that Colton, therefore, is in violation of its permit to discharge <br />from the Colton Sewer Plant into the river. <br />After discussion, moved by Councilman Rios, seconded by Councilwoman <br />Cisneros, to pass Second Reading and adopt Ordinance No. 1637• Motion <br />carried, with Councilman Rehrer voting NO. <br />Discussion then followed with regard to the rate charges for service. <br />Mr. McGee stated that in order to put the Ordinance in effect, the <br />City needs to adopt a resolution outlining the methods for charging <br />for services, and this needs to be done as soon as possible. <br />After additional discussion, moved by Councilwoman Cisneros, seconded <br />by Councilman Rios, to defer the matter of charges for services to a <br />later date for further study. Unanimous vote. <br />Sewers <br />Mr. McGee reported on the pumping of sewer effluent on an emergency <br />basis, which the City has been doing since March, at a cost of approx- <br />imately $14,000 per month, $7,000 for equipment rental and mainte- <br />nance, and $7,000 for twenty-four hour manning of the equipment, and <br />now it is estimated this operation will continue until September or <br />October at an additional cost of approximately $84,000 above that al- <br />ready spent for pumping operations. <br />"'AY 31983 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.