My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
2006 RES R-139-06
Colton
>
CITY CLERK
>
City Council Resolutions
>
2001-2010
>
2006
>
2006 RES R-139-06
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/24/2014 10:29:30 PM
Creation date
2/20/2014 5:50:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General Documents
Created By
sespinoza
DocType
Resolutions
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9' <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />a. While the signs proposed in the Application are an integral part of <br />retail sales appropriate for commercial areas, the signs proposed in the Application are <br />excessive in size and height, are inappropriately scaled, and are aesthetically obtrusive. <br />b. Granting the Application, as requested, would set a precedence for <br />allowing excessively "over -sized" signage in the community, contrary to the objectives of the <br />City's General Plan. <br />2. Land Use Element — Commercial Principle B-4 (pp. 2-23) states that, <br />"well-designed, human -scaled commercial developments featuring an attractive and efficient <br />pedestrian environment should be encouraged as they add to the responsiveness of <br />commercial growth to localized needs". <br />a. The request for variance from the height and size limitations set <br />forth in the City Zoning Ordinance to allow a freeway sign that is 75' above freeway grade <br />and 1,092 feet in area size is excessive. The proposed freeway sign is inappropriately <br />scaled, and would have a negative aesthetic effect on the surrounding community. <br />b. The requested deviation from the City Zoning Ordinance for the <br />proposed freeway sign is even more obtrusive when reviewed in conjunction with the <br />proposed over -sized improvements to the existing pole sign. <br />SECTION 3. Based on the entire record before the City Council and all <br />written and oral evidence presented, and the findings made in this Resolution, the City <br />Council hereby finds that the Application does not comply with the City's Zoning Ordinance. <br />1. Section 18.50.010(8) of the City's Zoning Ordinance states that the <br />City should, "Promote signs and graphics that are attractive, pleasing and harmonized with <br />the physical character of the environment and surrounding properties, while serving the <br />advertising needs of the business community. " <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.