2006 RES R-83-06 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

I SECTION 1. Based on the entire record before the City Council, all written 2 and oral evidence presented, and the findings made in this Resolution, the City Council 3 hereby finds that because an additional unpermitted structure, which was not addressed 4 in the Application, exists on the Subject Site further modification to the existing 5 Conditional Use Permit is required, including a comprehensive project description. 6 7 SECTION 2. Based on substantial evidence in the entire record before the 8 City Council, including all written and oral evidence presented, and the findings made in 9 this Resolution, the City Council hereby finds that Application does not comply with 10 CEQA because environmental review has not been completed and an Initial Study is I I required because there is a reasonable possibility that the Application will have a 12 significant effect on the environment due to unusual circumstances (State CEQA 13 Guidelines section 15300.2(c).) Among other things, the Initial Study should consider: 14 15 A. Consistency of the Application with the General Plan, As part of 16 the Initial Study, staff is directed to consider consistency of the Application with the 17 General Plan including the following: 18 19 1 . Principle C-1 of the Land Use Element provides that: 20 Industrial uses need to be located in areas compatible with surrounding uses such as 21 adjacent to railroads and freeways. The closest homes are located approximately 350 22 ft. west of the Subject Site. Applicant's operations currently occur on the eastern half of 23 the Subject Site, which is approximately 1,000 ft. from the closest neighborhood. 24 25 During the public testimony presented to the Planning 26 Commission, a resident from the neighborhood located near 27 the Subject Site stated that prior to paving the Subject Site, 28 Applicant had operated smelters and wrecked vehicles on the dirt. This resident expressed concern about lead and 4