2006 RES R-85-06 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

Ell 0 7 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Ground Vibration Measurements on M Street at the Northwest Corner of M & 11th, May 3, 2006, at pp. 16-17.) Also, note that the Court upheld the 2004 EIR with regard to its analysis of noise impacts. 6. Finally, the City Council finds that with respect to the remaining goals, policies and objectives of the General Plan, the proposed Project will not directly conflict with any goals, policies and objectives that are fundamental, mandatory and unambiguous. SECTION 3. Based on the entire record before the City Council and all written and oral evidence presented, including the Planning Commission staff report and attachments thereto, the findings made in this Resolution and by the Planning Commission in Resolution No. R-05-06, the 2004 Record, the 2004 EIR (including the addenda), the Revised DEIR and the Revised Final EIR and the comments and responses thereto, the City Council finds that the proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of Title 18 of the Colton Municipal Code. Except for the proposed overheight wall on the southerly property line, the Project complies or will comply, with adherence to mitigation measures, with all requirements of the Colton Zoning Ordinance (Title 18). (See August 24, 2004, Planning Commission Agenda Report at pp. 2-5; and June 13, 2006, Planning Commission Agenda Report.) A. The Applications propose a use that is not specifically permitted in the M-2 heavy industrial zone, but that may be approved following review by the Planning Commission. (Colton Municipal Code § 18.28.010.) B. The Planning Commission found (see PC Resolution No. R-05-06) that the Applications are for a use that supports the intent of the M-2 zone, which is intended to provide for the establishment of industrial uses essential to the development. The City Council concurs with this finding. C. The Planning Commission also found (see PC Resolution No. R-05-06) that the Applications are compatible with other uses permitted in the M-2 zone, and that the emission of odor, dust, fumes, gas, noise, vibration and other similar undesirable characteristics will not be detrimental to any abutting zone or the community as a whole. The City Council also concurs with this finding. The Project includes design features that mitigate the impact of the Applications. For example, the construction of a fluff containment structure, use of enclosed steel tank for water storage, and paving of the property will reduce dust, and other undesirable characteristics of the Project. (See Reivsed DEIR page 3-5, Testimony of Chuck Siroonian, November 16, 2004 public hearing) SECTION 4. Based on the entire record before the City Council and all written and oral evidence presented, including the Planning Commission staff report and attachments thereto, the findings made in this Resolution and by the Planning Commission in Resolution No. R-05-06, the 2004 Record, the 2004 EIR (including the addenda), the Revised DEIR and the Revised Final EIR and the comments and responses thereto, the City Council finds that the proposed amendment together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity of the Subject Site. The proposed amendment authorizes: (1) the installation and operation of a metal shredder as an expansion to an existing scrap metal facility; (2) the construction of an approximate 30' X 250" metal building; and (3) an increase in the volume of railroad transloading. The proposed Project is (1) consistent with the general plan and land use -7-