Laserfiche WebLink
CITY OF COLTON <br />AGENDA REPORT <br />For Council Meeting ofSeptember18, 1990 <br />TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council <br />FROM: John C. Hutton, Public Works Director <br />SUBJECT: AUTHORIZATION TO PROCEED WITH FY 90/91 STREET <br />REHABILITATION/MAINTENANCE PROJECT <br />Date : September 12, 1990 <br />BACKGROUND <br />As part of this fiscal year's proposed street rehabilitation program, staff has <br />reviewed more particularly, the need of each street within the program by the <br />condition of the roadway and what type of treatment is necessary to provide optimum <br />benefit and durability. <br />STATEMENT OF PROBLEM <br />The current contract, of which was approved in FY 89/90 and held within it the <br />ability to extend the contract, thus holding asphalt prices directly related to oil <br />prices at bay, is a major advantage to the City; oil prices have risen dramatically. <br />The disadvantage is that the previous year's contract did not include the ability to <br />provide the process known as "heater remixing" the existing asphalt. This is a <br />process used to regenerate the existing asphalt and bind it to the new asphalt <br />layer. <br />ALTERNATIVES <br />The cost, although not included in the original contract, has been submitted by the <br />contractor, reviewed by staff, and found to be much more reasonable to add as an <br />additional service to the existing contract than would be to rebid the entire <br />project and be faced with a 40 to 50 percent asphalt price increase due to oil price <br />increases over the last five months. <br />FINANCIAL IMPACT <br />ine neater remix process is needed for several of the streets within the proposed <br />projects in order to provide maximum benefit to those streets. This process would <br />be in the new contract if rebid and within 4.to 5 percent t the cost proposal <br />submitted. <br />This process is proposed for six out of the thirteen streets being rehabilitated <br />and, compared to the 40 to 50 percent increase that would be prevalent to the <br />increased asphalt costs, would be of no measurable financial impact compared to the <br />asphalt cost increases. <br />ENV I ROMv1ENTAL IMPACT <br />None. <br />Attachments: 1 <br />Page 1 of --2— ORIGINAL Item No._I(-)_ <br />,9 I `�" <br />!FILL N-0. ��1.�.----... <br />