My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
1991 AGN JAN 03 I14
Colton
>
CITY CLERK
>
City Council Agendas
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990 - 1999
>
1991
>
1991 January 03 Agenda Packet
>
1991 AGN JAN 03 I14
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/27/2014 12:40:13 PM
Creation date
2/20/2014 7:06:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General Documents
Created By
avillalba
DocType
General Documents
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
operation. Questionab{e steering, suspension, brakes, or connecting devices <br />are not to be continued in service for the purpose of "forcing a failure" in <br />order to diagnose its cause.) Supervisors should continue training drivers in <br />vehicle inspection and improving the skills of both drivers and mechanics in <br />working with one another. <br />necessary in any preventive maintenance program. <br />Good communication between drivers, mechanics, and supervisors is absolutely <br />Poor communication, or <br />worse, personal f~icti.on between those personnel can virtually shut down the <br />best preventive maintenance program, sending maintenance costs higher while <br />producing inadequate results. <br />DRIVER'S DAILY VEHICLE_ INSPECTION <br />A driver need not be a mechanic or even mechanically -inclined to be a valuable <br />part of the company's preventive maintenance pr -gram. Persons with no more <br />knowledge of a motor vehicle than how to -drive =t often notice when a strange <br />noise develops, or when the brakes feel differ6A from normal, or that it has <br />become harder to steer in one direction than in the other. These are all <br />examples of clues that the condition of the vehicle is changing. The driver <br />shouldreport any unusual conditions to the mechanic or to his supervisor, so <br />that a knowledgeable person can look into the matter. For this reason, 13 CCR <br />1215 (a) requires drivers of trucks and buses to inspect their vehicles prior <br />to operation each day to determine that they are in safe condition, are <br />equipped as required, and that the required equipment is working properly. <br />There is no official list of items to inspect for most vehicles, except <br />certain buses. Spelling out what to inspect in most cases is the <br />responsibility of the employer. Drivers are not normally expected to perform <br />an in-depth inspection such.as a mechanic would do, but certain items can be <br />inspected by drivers without their having to receive extensive mechanical <br />training. 13 CCR 1215 (a) reads, in part: <br />1215. Vehicle Condition. <br />It shall be unlawful for the driver to drive a vehicle that <br />is not in safe operating condition or is notequippedas <br />required by all provisions of law and this subchapter. The <br />driver is specifically responsible for the following: <br />(a) Daily Inspection. Prior to operation, the driver <br />shall inspect each vehicle daily to ascertain that it is in <br />safe condition, it is equipped as required by all provisions <br />of law, and all equipment is in good working order. <br />The requirement to Perform a daily pretrip inspection applies to all drivers <br />i <br />of all vehicles, listed in 34500 CVC, without exception. Thereis no legal ' <br />provision for this task to be delegated to someone other than the driver, such) <br />as to a mechanic who may arrive at work early to start all of the trucks or <br />+ buses and "check them out". There is nothing wrong with having a mechanic or j <br />2-7 HPG 84.6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.