My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
1994 AGN JAN 18 I26
Colton
>
CITY CLERK
>
City Council Agendas
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990 - 1999
>
1994
>
1994 January 18 Agenda Packet
>
1994 AGN JAN 18 I26
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/24/2014 5:41:29 PM
Creation date
2/20/2014 6:15:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General Documents
Created By
avillalba
DocType
General Documents
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
AGENDA REPORT <br />City Council Meeting <br />January 18, 1994 <br />bachelor's degree for a public health program representative, not a certified medical worker but <br />an information officer, was upheld because of the contact of that person with the public and the <br />need for accuracy in handling questions from the public (Rice v. St. Louis (1978) 464 F. Supp. <br />138, aff'd 607 F. 2d 791). <br />It is important to note that the three factors discussed are not necessarily controlling in <br />any given instance. The courts have upheld educational requirements in other circumstances and <br />have invalidated such requirements in situations that would appear to meet the concerns <br />discussed above. In some jurisdictions, Federal Uniform Guidelines on Selection Procedures <br />have been held to be the mandatory method for validating educational requirements. In <br />California, however, such guidelines have been viewed as merely preferred approaches that need <br />not be rigidly_ applied. <br />The City of Riverside routinely requires bachelor's degrees for its mid-level management <br />positions and has found that in some cases, the requirement has proved to be a burden because <br />once it is set forth in the job description the City has been unable to waive the requirement for <br />candidates that it viewed as otherwise fully qualified for advertised positions. While, as Mr. <br />Johnson has reported, the trend in recent years has been for cities to require a particular degree <br />or experience equivalent to such a degree, the City of Colton is not required to adhere to that <br />trend. On several occasions members of the City Council have indicated their intent to upgrade <br />all management positions by requiring certain minimal educational accomplishments related to <br />the job to be performed. As these positions are reviewed and revised when turnover occurs, it <br />is well within the discretion of the City to consider such changes even though current personnel <br />may not meet the new standards that will thereafter be required of applicants. <br />It is the nature of government to evolve and to determine from past experiences what <br />improvements are needed in order for governmental services to be delivered in a more efficient <br />and professional manner. So long as new requirements are not retroactively imposed on current <br />personnel and so long as such new requirements are genuinely related to the jobs on which they <br />are imposed, the City may add such requirements. The City should be aware, however, that to <br />the extent that an educational requirement may only be met by a particular degree, the City may <br />have the burden of proving the business necessity for the degree in the event that a legal <br />challenge is brought against the City based upon a discriminatory effect caused by that <br />requirement. <br />Concurrence: <br />City *13w1ager <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.