My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
1994 AGN JAN 18 I26
Colton
>
CITY CLERK
>
City Council Agendas
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990 - 1999
>
1994
>
1994 January 18 Agenda Packet
>
1994 AGN JAN 18 I26
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/24/2014 5:41:29 PM
Creation date
2/20/2014 6:15:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General Documents
Created By
avillalba
DocType
General Documents
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
y <br />CITY OF COLTON <br />INTEROFFICE MEMO <br />TO: JERRY L. YOUNG �` DAT <br />CITY MANAGER <br />of <br />f <br />'�`��orvorate � <br />a <br />1887 <br />a t f atv <br />E. JANUARY 6, 1994 <br />GORDON R. JOHNSON <br />Personnel Director <br />MINIMUM EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS ON JOB DESCRIPTIONS <br />On December 21, 1993, the City Council voted to amend the proposed job description for Purchasing Manager, <br />requiring a bachelor's degree rather than the equivalent to a Bachelor's degree. In addition, they eliminated <br />the language permitting any combination of experience and education that would likelyprovide p de the required <br />knowledge and abilities to be qualifying. While I applaud the Council's desire to upgrade the standards for <br />this important management position, potential problems which may arise from such action or similar actions <br />on other job descriptions include: <br />1. Establishment of minimum standards for a division headosition which are higher than for cit <br />department head positions To my knowledge, all City of Colton job descriptions have the equivalency <br />language in them which the Council removed from the Purchasing Manager description recently. This <br />includes the City Manager and all Department Heads, The employee associations may have a legitimate <br />concern if our minimum requirements are not consistent throughout the city. <br />Conflict with Equal Employment Opportunity laws and court decisions California Government. Code <br />Section 19702.2 states in part: <br />"Educational prerequisites or testing or evaluation methods which are not job-related shall not be <br />employed as part of hiring practices or promotional practices conducted pursuant to this part <br />unless there is no adverse effect." <br />If fewer members of a protected class in the relevant labor market possess the necessary qualifications, <br />so that the use of the requirement operates as a barrier to that group's employment opportunity, the City <br />has the burden of proving that its minimum education or experience qualifications are BJOQs (bona fide <br />occupational qualifications). Attached are some pages discussing this issue from the EMPLOYMENT <br />COORDINATOR, a set of volumes discussing legal aspects of personnel management. The referenced <br />pages discuss how minimum education and experience requirements in job descriptions may adversely <br />effect protected class members in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The trend the <br />past 30 years has been to replace mandatory minimum education and experience requirements with <br />equivalency language like that found in our job descriptions. <br />Potential violation of the City's Affirmative Action Program Article VII B 1 & 2 state <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.