1994 AGN MAY 03 I05 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

Mssrs. H;�u, Collins, and Drew April 21, 1994 Page 2 The issues and the resolution as provided for in the 1994 Set�tlement Agreement are as follows: 1) Intec�ration of City Replaceable Resources Pursuant to the 1990 Settlement Agreement, each City had a one-time right to replace those Special Condition 12 resources that had been integrated as part of the 1990 Settlement. A dispute had arisen with Edison over how to implement that right. Section 5.1.1 of the 1994 Settlement Agreement provides that a City must give a minimum of six months' notice prior to the date of integration of the new resource, but no later than three years after the contract for the original resource terminates. The 1994 Settlement also provides each City with flexibility as to the level of capacity credit for the Replaceable Resource. Furthermore, a City may replace the resource with one or more new resources with varying operation dates. 2) Preschedulinq of Interruptible Transmission Service Section 5.1.2 of the 1994 Settlement Agreement provides that Edison will meet with Cities and others to attempt to negotiate terms and conditions for prescheduled ITS. If the parties cannot agree on such service by July l, 1994, then Edison agrees to provide the service using ITS under the Western Systems Power Pool Agreement (WSPP) for a period of two years. During that two-year period, Edison and Cities agree to use mediation to resolve the issue. 3) Sugplemental Non-Firm Enerqy Aqreements Section 5.1.3 of the 1994 Settlement provides a procedure to expedite integration and FERC filing of these agreements. 4) STS Schedulinq Practices Section 5.1.4 provides a procedure for resolving a dispute between Anaheim/Riverside and Edison over the scheduling of energy over the STS. 5) Correction of Resource Accountinc� Schedule Errors Section 5.1.5 provides for a 180-day period for any party of correct ministerial or typographical errors in a Resource Accounting Schedule and revise billing.