Laserfiche WebLink
AGENDA REPORT <br />CITY OF COLTON <br />For City Council Meeting of <br />May 3, 1994 <br />April 27, 1994 <br />TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY UNCIL <br />FROM: Julie Hayward Biggs, City Att rn <br />SUBJECT: Elimination of Civil Service Status for Department Heads <br />At the City Council meeting of April 5, 1994, the Council approved first reading <br />of Ordinance number 0-08-94 which would eliminate civil service protection for department <br />heads. That Ordinance was silent as to its effect on currently employed City department heads <br />and so would only be applicable to department heads hired after the effective date of the <br />ordinance. <br />The Council requested that the City Attorney review the possibility, ;offminating <br />civil service protection for current department heads. As prior legal counsel had consistently <br />advised the City that elimination of civil service protection for department heads could only <br />apply to prospective employees because of the property interest department heads acquire over <br />time in their positions, I requested an opinion on this issue from Brunick, Alvarez & Battersby. <br />That opinion is attached. <br />The conclusion reached by Brunick, Alvarez & Battersby is that elimination of <br />civil service protection for current department heads may only be accomplished by consent of <br />each current department head or through the establishment of a formal bargaining unit that would <br />then meet and confer with the City regarding this issue. It is clear from the Brunick, Alvarez <br />& Battersby opinion that negotiation with existing employees on this issue will require good faith <br />exchange of benefits or salary for the elimination of an existing employment benefit such as civil <br />service protection. <br />Mr. Jack Prindeville, acting Personnel Director, also forwarded an article <br />addressing this issue prepared by the National Public Employer Labor Relations Association. <br />That publication confirms the legal difficulties inherent in eliminating civil service protection <br />from current department heads. The article suggests that even without civil service protection <br />such employees have a property right in their employees acquired simply as a result of extended <br />tenure in those positions that requires substantive and procedural due process for termination. <br />I have attached a copy of that article for your information and review. <br />