Laserfiche WebLink
AGENDA REPORT <br />CITY OF COLTON <br />For City Council Meeting of <br />May 3, 1994 <br />April 27, 1994 <br />TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL <br />FROM: Julie Hayward Biggs, City Attorg <br />e <br />SUBJECT: Provision of Copies of the Brown Act to Councilmembers and Commissioners <br />Recently several members of various commissions have requested that they be <br />provided copies of the Ralph M. Brown Act (Government Code Sections 54950 et LN., the <br />"Brown Act"). Government Code Section 54952.7 provides as follows in this regard: <br />I <br />"A legislative body of a agency may require that a copy of this cheater be <br />given to each member of the legislative body and any person selected to serve as <br />a member of the legislative body who has not assumed the duties of ice. An <br />elected legislative body of a local agency may require that a copy of s chapter <br />be given to each member of each legislative &0ody all or a 04ority of whose <br />e(i eber are appointed by or under the authority of the 0ated legislative <br />body., <br />The Brown Act is, of course, a public document accessible to any member of the <br />public through the Government Code. This new provision allows the Council to Leguire <br />distribution at City cost of the Brown Act to all councilmembers and commissioners. In the <br />past, Best, Best & Krieger as City Attorney has recommended that general distribution of the <br />Brown Act not occur because changes that are enacted over time may change the operative <br />sections and distribution by the City to all councilmembers and commissioners would require <br />constant updating to assure current copies of operative provisions are distributed. Further, it <br />has been thought that because the Brown Act cannot be construed by lay persons in a vacuum, <br />that is without reference to applicable case law and other legal interpretations that are announced <br />over time, general distribution of the Brown Act could cause undue confusion and <br />misinformation. It was thought that leaving interpretation of the Brown Act to the City Attorney <br />as a legal professional was sufficient guidance to the council and the commissions. <br />AD <br />