Laserfiche WebLink
22V <br />City Attorney Edwards then read that portion of the Agreement pertaining to With- <br />drawal of Party - "Any party may withdraw from this Agreement as of the first day <br />of July of any year following six (6) months notice to the other parties". <br />On Council consensus, Staff was directed to prepare a feasibility study of the City <br />establishing its own transit system. <br />PUBLIC HEARINGS: <br />Agreements <br />Housing Authority <br />Mayor Gonzales declared the Continuance of the Public Hearing. <br />City Clerk Ramos submitted the Notice of Posting Continuance of Public Hearing. <br />Mr. Phil Rush, representing the County Office of Community Development, spoke to the <br />Council Members reiterating information concerning the Cooperation Agreement, the <br />County Housing Authority's application for publicly owned housing units, the Community <br />Development Block Grant Agreement between the County and participating cities, and <br />the Housing Assistance Plan, as it applies to the County and each participating city. <br />Mr. Rush then addressed his remarks to three specific questions, brought up at a <br />previous meeting, relating to the Cooperation Agreement between the City of Colton <br />and the Housing Authority of the County of San Bernardino, as follows: <br />Q <br />1. What are the City's contractual obligations in implementing the Housing Assistance <br />Q Plan for the County. <br />2. What are the specific Housing Assistance needs identified for the City. <br />3. What are the potential results if the City does not, in fact, enter into the <br />proposed Cooperation Agreement at this time. <br />Mr. Rush then outlined the requirements of any public entity receiving Community <br />Development Block Grant funds from HUD as it relates to the Housing Assistance <br />Plan and its goals to provide low and moderate income housing units within their <br />communities. <br />City Manager Calabrese stated to Mr. Rush is there a separation or difference <br />between the Ballot Measure and the Housing and Community Development Block <br />Grant. <br />Mr. Rush stated the Ballot Measure, or Article 34 Referendum Authority, is another <br />tool that can be used to attract and implement the Housing Assistance Plan, and <br />authorizes local jurisdictions, who have passed the measure in their communities <br />by the majority of registered voters, to compete for State funding which can be <br />utilized to construct low and moderate income housing. <br />Discussion then followed with regard to State and Federal funding, and how State <br />funding can be derived through Federal funds. <br />Mr. Calabrese said when the Ballot Measure, Article 34 Referendum Authority, was <br />initially presented to the City Council, it was stated there were State bond monies <br />available which the County would be applying for, and there was no obligation on <br />the City's part to participate; however, now it seems that the Block Grant Funds <br />are being tied into the Article 34 Referendum for the State Bond monies. <br />Mr. Don Newcomb, Division Director of the Planning Division, County Office of Com- <br />munity Development, stated he had originally presented this Measure to the City <br />Council last year, requesting that the City of Colton place the Referendum Measure <br />on their Ballot for the November Election. Mr. Newcomb explained that Article 34 <br />of the State Constitution simply requires an affirmative vote of the majority of <br />registered voters permitting public housing, Section 8, new construction, assisted <br />housing, it has no tie whatsoever with bond monies or potential bond monies, it <br />simply allows and gives the jurisdiction the Referendum Authority so that they may <br />pursue these units, however, it has no tie to financing whatsoever. <br />Mr. Calabrese then pointed out that the Ballot Measure clearly states "Housing <br />built or rehabilitated", not "and" rehabilitated, and the City of Colton presently <br />has an application for Section 8 housing which seems to comply with what the <br />County is asking, as the City of Colton has been participating in the rehabilita- <br />tion of housing under the Housing and Community Development Block Grant, and Colton <br />will probably exceed the 30 percent requirement of the Grant. Mr. Calabrese said <br />if the City of Colton has complied with these requirements thus far, why do we have <br />to go through this other step. <br />APR 3 1979 <br />