1980 REG MTG MIN MAY 20 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

4 10 I am not a businesswoman; I am not out to make a real estate "killing"; I'm just trying to make the best of that which was left to us by my husband. Lawsuits do not appeal to me, however, I have sent a copy of this letter to an attorney friend with a note expressing my hope that his services will not be needed. I cannot comprehend that you would elect to have this property remain a dustbowl tumble- weed patch instead of an operating, taxpaying business. Thank you for your patient and careful reconsideration of this matter. As always, I will rely on your greater wisdom to arrive at a just and reasonable decision. Faye Pribble 11816 Myrtlewood Colton, California 92324 383-1495 Mayor Gonzales, Councilwoman Garcia, Councilmen Hayes and Rehrer each, individual- ly, spoke in favor of the proposed business expressing their opinions and reasons for approval. Councilwoman Cisneros spoke in opposition to the proposed operation, stating she was opposed to junk yards. Mayor Gonzales then asked for a Roll Call Vote on the motion as made: AYES: Four; Hayes, Rehrer, Garcia, Gonzales. NOES: One; Cisneros. ABSENT: None. Motion carried. Conditional Use Permits P. C. Res. No. 947 Mr. Trevino reported on a Conditional Use Permit application requested by Fox Development Corporation to construct a 104 condominium unit development on 4.8 - acres located east of Pepper Avenue, between Valley Boulevard and San Bernardino Avenue, which will contain 40 one -bedroom units consisting of 690 square feet, and 64 two-bedroom units consisting of 940 square feet. Mr. Trevino advised the property is located in a R -3-X zone, the "X" classification requiring a conditional use permit for any development. Mr. Trevino stated the City's General Plan designates this area as medium density which allows 7 to 15 units per acre and the project calls for approximately 22 units per acre, which clearly violates the integrity of the General Plan. Mr. Trevino concluded the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this item May 13, 1980, and after studying and researching this application, recommended denial of the Conditional Use Permit request due to five findings as listed in Planning Commission Resolution No. 947. Moved by Councilwoman Cisneros, seconded by Councilman Hayes, to approve Planning Commission Resolution No. 947, denying Conditional Use Permit, C-9-80, as request- ed. Unanimous vote. Variances P. C. Res. No. 948 Mr. Trevino reviewed his memorandum dated May 15, 1980, regarding a Variance ap- plication requested by Arrowhead Puritas Water Company to install a 10 foot high chain link fence topped with barbed wire on the property at 120 Fogg Street. Mr. Trevino stated this is a permitted use as outlined in Section 15.24.050 of the Colton Municipal Code. Mr. Trevino stated the Planning Commission, at a public hearing held May 13, 1980, recommended approval of the. Variance application, together with three findings, as outlined in Planning Commission Resolution No. 948. Moved by Councilman Hayes, seconded by Councilwoman Garcia, to approve Planning Commission Resolution No. 948, V-6-80. Vote was unanimous. Planning Case Files Trailer Request Mr. Trevino reported on a request from Mr. Maurice Meyers of Colton-Wartsila, Inc., located at 330 West Citrus Avenue, for temporary use of a trailer as office space at their facility while permanent offices are being constructed. Mr. Trevino advised that temporary use of a trailer for this purpose is permitted MAY 2 0 1980