|
10
<br />11
<br />12
<br />13
<br />14
<br />15
<br />16
<br />17
<br />18
<br />19
<br />20
<br />21
<br />22
<br />23
<br />24
<br />25
<br />26
<br />27
<br />28
<br />Colton Ordinance No. 0-15-16
<br />2) Parcels zoned M-1, Light Industrial and bounded by La Cadena Drive to the west,
<br />Fogg Street to the south and BNSF railroad line to the east, and located at 1070
<br />S La Cadena Drive - APN 0163-273-07. Hereinafter referred to as "Area 9".
<br />3) Parcels zoned M-1, SDA -0 -Light Industrial, Sensitive Development Area -Overlay
<br />and bounded by O Street to the north, Congress Street to the south, the Ninth
<br />Street railroad spur line to the west, and Veterans Park to the east, and located at
<br />234 E O Street - APN 0163-221-39. Hereinafter referred to as "Area 10a".
<br />4) Parcel zoned R-1, Low Density Residential, and bounded by Congress Street to
<br />the south, "M-1" zoned property to the west, Veterans Parks to the north, and "R-
<br />1" zoned properties to the east, and located at 271 E Congress - APN 0163-221-
<br />35. Hereinafter referred to as "Area l Ob".
<br />WHEREAS, the Planning Commission directed staff to prepare separate resolutions
<br />relating to recommendations on Areas 6, 9, and 10, as described above; and
<br />WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, following the conclusion of said hearing, the
<br />Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. R-21-16, recommending approval to the City
<br />Council of an Ordinance for Text and Map Amendments relating to Areas 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, and 8, as
<br />described above; and adopted Resolution No. R-22-16 recommending to the City Council the
<br />approval of the proposed project regarding recommendations relating to Areas 6, 9, and 10, as
<br />described above; and
<br />WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the project, as original
<br />described, except for the proposed zone changes to Area 5, 8, and I Oa and, instead, recommended
<br />that the zoning for these areas remain unchanged; and
<br />WHEREAS, on August 2, 2016, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing at
<br />which time all persons wishing to testify in connection with the application were heard and the
<br />application was comprehensively reviewed; and
<br />WHEREAS, also on August 2, 2016, the City Council continued the hearing to August 16,
<br />2016 and September 20, 2016, and remanded the application back to the Planning Commission for
<br />consideration of a modified application applying the SDA -0 zone to Area 8, as described above;
<br />and
<br />WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing, after giving published notice,
<br />on August 23, 2016 for consideration of the modified application applying the SDA -0 zone to Area
<br />8, as described above; and
<br />WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, following the conclusion of said hearing, the
<br />Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. R-29-16, recommending approval to the City
<br />Council of an updated Ordinance that includes applying the SDA -0 zone to Area 8, as described
<br />above; and
<br />WHEREAS, on _, 2016, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing at which
<br />-3-
<br />
|