Laserfiche WebLink
CITY OF COLTON <br />AGENDA REPORT <br />FOR THE COUNCIL MEETING OF NOVEMBER 7, 2006 <br />TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br />FROM: David R. Zamora, Community Development Director <br />SUBJECT: Approval of Second Amendment to the Professional Services Agreem <br />with Michael Brandman Associates (MBA) to Provide Professio <br />Environmental Services/CEQA Processing for the Pacific Rail Industries R <br />Dismantling and Salvage Operations Facility <br />DATE: October 19, 2006 <br />BACKGROUND: <br />On November 16, 2004, the City Council approved a Modification to the Conditional Use Permit (CUP <br />No. C-5-86) for Pacific Rail Industries to allow the relocation and re -assembly of a metai shredding <br />facility and a fifty percent increase in transloading activity. The approval action included the <br />Certification of an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting <br />Program (MMRP) in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The EIR was <br />prepared by Michel Brandman Associates, an environmental consultant under contract to the city. <br />Pacific Rail Industries received approval of the original CUP No. C-5-86 in 1986 for the development <br />and operation of a rail dismantling and salvage operations facility at 785 East "M" Street. On <br />December 2, 2004, Hugo Neu-Proler Company d.b.a. Colton Iron and Metal (CIM) filed a Writ of <br />Mandate with the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of San Bernardino alleging <br />the City of Colton violated CEQA and contended that the EIR does not comply with CEQA in 13 areas. <br />Due to the legal action filed by CIM, the applicant has been unable to start with the project. On <br />October 18, 2005, the Court issued a Statement of Decision on this matter and found that the EIR was <br />insufficient in the following areas: (1) Traffic, (2) Hazardous Materials, (3) Air Quality, and (4) <br />Recirculation of the EIR. <br />In order to address the inadequacies of the referenced environmental factors, and at the request of the <br />applicant, on November 1, 2005, the City Council approved a professional services agreement with <br />MBA in the amount of One Hundred Forty -Five Thousand Eight Hundred Seventy -Five Dollars <br />($145,875.00) to prepare the required additional environmental work and for the re -circulation of the <br />EIR as identified by the court. The Council subsequently approved a First Amendment to the MBA <br />Professional Services Agreement in the amount of $27,000.00 on May 16, 2006, to cover work beyond <br />that provided in the original Scope of Work and Budget. Staff is now requesting approval of a Second <br />Amendment to the Agreement in the amount of $23,780.00 for additional expenses incurred during the <br />months of June and July 2006 by the Consultant at the request of the City's project team. All costs for <br />the project are being paid by Pacific Rail Industries; there is no impact to the City General Fund. <br />ANALYSIS/DISCUSSION: <br />During the final preparations of the Re -circulated Environmental Impact Report, additional work <br />beyond the original Scope of Work and Budget was required for the following three items: (A) <br />Additional Services for the Revision of the Traffic Study; (B) Response to Comments for the Final Re- <br />