Laserfiche WebLink
CITY OF COLTON <br />AGENDA REPORT <br />FOR COUNCIL MEETING OF August 3, 1999 <br />Honorable Mayor and City Council <br />PROVAL: Henry T. Garcia, City Manager <br />FROM: City Attorney <br />SUBJECT: Resolution recommending the State Legislature pass legislation <br />permitting greater local control over community care facilities, <br />group homes and other congregate care facilities <br />DATE: August 3, 1999 <br />BACKGROUND: <br />In recent years, Federal and State legislation has severely limited the ability of <br />California cities to regulate community care facilities, group homes and other congregate <br />care living arrangements. Moreover, both Federal and California case law also prohibit <br />cities from limiting single family occupancies to blood relatives. At the same time, <br />legislatively adopted social policy favoring integration of special needs groups such as <br />the handicapped, mentally ill, recovering drug addicts and alcoholics into local residential <br />settings, instead of incarceration or institutionalization, has created an enormous <br />demand for such housing. <br />Although California law provides regulatory and licensing statutes for some congregate <br />living arrangements, other facilities are not regulated by the state at all. Typically, these <br />facilities are operated by religious groups, non-profit corporations or associations and <br />clean -and -sober living organizations, but a few are operated by individuals whose only <br />interest appears to be the disability checks received by their resident clients. Further, <br />state law prohibits the application of local zoning laws to facilities with six or fewer <br />residents and federal law places significant restrictions on local control of most facilities, <br />even when the facilities contain seven or more residents or are unregulated by the state. <br />Cities have expressed concerns that both licensed and unlicensed facilities may <br />severely impact the neighborhoods in which they are located. Cities have argued that <br />unusually high traffic, parking and noise impacts, coupled with the general incompatibility <br />of the use, lead to the impairment of the integrity of residential neighborhoods. <br />Moreover, because of the lack of local control over licensed facilities and the lack of <br />state regulations and local authority over unlicensed facilities, cities have very little ability <br />to deal with the impacts. Currently, the California Legislature is considering the following <br />measures to provide cities with additional local control over such facilities: <br />RVPUB\MXM\522682 <br />Item #26 <br />