My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
1994 AGN MAY 03 I20
Colton
>
CITY CLERK
>
City Council Agendas
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990 - 1999
>
1994
>
1994 May 03 Agenda Packet
>
1994 AGN MAY 03 I20
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/24/2014 1:15:06 PM
Creation date
2/20/2014 7:42:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General Documents
Created By
avillalba
DocType
General Documents
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
AGENDA REPORT <br />CITY OF COLTON <br />For City Council Meeting of <br />May 3, 1994 <br />April 27, 1994 <br />TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL <br />FROM: Julie Hayward Biggs, City Attorg <br />e <br />SUBJECT: Provision of Copies of the Brown Act to Councilmembers and Commissioners <br />Recently several members of various commissions have requested that they be <br />provided copies of the Ralph M. Brown Act (Government Code Sections 54950 et LN., the <br />"Brown Act"). Government Code Section 54952.7 provides as follows in this regard: <br />I <br />"A legislative body of a agency may require that a copy of this cheater be <br />given to each member of the legislative body and any person selected to serve as <br />a member of the legislative body who has not assumed the duties of ice. An <br />elected legislative body of a local agency may require that a copy of s chapter <br />be given to each member of each legislative &0ody all or a 04ority of whose <br />e(i eber are appointed by or under the authority of the 0ated legislative <br />body., <br />The Brown Act is, of course, a public document accessible to any member of the <br />public through the Government Code. This new provision allows the Council to Leguire <br />distribution at City cost of the Brown Act to all councilmembers and commissioners. In the <br />past, Best, Best & Krieger as City Attorney has recommended that general distribution of the <br />Brown Act not occur because changes that are enacted over time may change the operative <br />sections and distribution by the City to all councilmembers and commissioners would require <br />constant updating to assure current copies of operative provisions are distributed. Further, it <br />has been thought that because the Brown Act cannot be construed by lay persons in a vacuum, <br />that is without reference to applicable case law and other legal interpretations that are announced <br />over time, general distribution of the Brown Act could cause undue confusion and <br />misinformation. It was thought that leaving interpretation of the Brown Act to the City Attorney <br />as a legal professional was sufficient guidance to the council and the commissions. <br />AD <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.